High-level classification of the Fungi and a tool for evolutionary ecological analyses

被引:0
作者
Leho Tedersoo
Santiago Sánchez-Ramírez
Urmas Kõljalg
Mohammad Bahram
Markus Döring
Dmitry Schigel
Tom May
Martin Ryberg
Kessy Abarenkov
机构
[1] University of Tartu,Natural History Museum
[2] University of Tartu,Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences
[3] Estonian Young Academy of Sciences,Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
[4] University of Toronto,Systematic Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre
[5] Uppsala University,Department of Biosciences
[6] Global Biodiversity Information Facility,undefined
[7] University of Helsinki,undefined
[8] Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria,undefined
来源
Fungal Diversity | 2018年 / 90卷
关键词
51 new taxa; Species Hypothesis; Taxonomy of fungi; Phylogenetic classification; Subkingdom; Phylum; Nucleariae; Ascomycota; Aphelidiomycota; Basidiobolomycota; Basidiomycota; Blastocladiomycota; Calcarisporiellomycota; Chytridiomycota; Entomophthoromycota; Entorrhizomycota; Glomeromycota; Kickxellomycota; Monoblepharomycota; Mortierellomycota; Mucoromycota; Neocallimastigomycota; Olpidiomycota; Rozellomycota; Zoopagomycota;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
High-throughput sequencing studies generate vast amounts of taxonomic data. Evolutionary ecological hypotheses of the recovered taxa and Species Hypotheses are difficult to test due to problems with alignments and the lack of a phylogenetic backbone. We propose an updated phylum- and class-level fungal classification accounting for monophyly and divergence time so that the main taxonomic ranks are more informative. Based on phylogenies and divergence time estimates, we adopt phylum rank to Aphelidiomycota, Basidiobolomycota, Calcarisporiellomycota, Glomeromycota, Entomophthoromycota, Entorrhizomycota, Kickxellomycota, Monoblepharomycota, Mortierellomycota and Olpidiomycota. We accept nine subkingdoms to accommodate these 18 phyla. We consider the kingdom Nucleariae (phyla Nuclearida and Fonticulida) as a sister group to the Fungi. We also introduce a perl script and a newick-formatted classification backbone for assigning Species Hypotheses into a hierarchical taxonomic framework, using this or any other classification system. We provide an example of testing evolutionary ecological hypotheses based on a global soil fungal data set.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 159
页数:24
相关论文
共 612 条
[1]  
Abarenkov K(2010)The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi—recent updates and future perspectives New Phytol 186 281-285
[2]  
Nilsson RH(2012)The revised classification of eukaryotes J Eukaryot Microbiol 59 429-493
[3]  
Larsson K-H(1999)Proposal for a standardized temporal scheme of biological classification for extant species Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96 7358-7363
[4]  
Alexander IJ(2016)Millions of reads, thousands of taxa: microbial community structure and associations analyzed via marker genes FEMS Microbiol Rev 40 686-700
[5]  
Eberhardt U(1980)An outline for the reclassification of the Chytridiales, and for a new order, the Spizellomycetales Can J Bot 58 2380-2394
[6]  
Erland S(2006)The simple-septate basidiomycetes: a synopsis Mycol Progr 5 41-66
[7]  
Høiland K(2015)Entorrhizomycota: a new fungal phylum reveals new perspectives on the evolution of Fungi PLoS ONE 10 e0128183-621
[8]  
Kjøller R(1979)Zygomycetes and their spores Whole Fungus 2 573-245
[9]  
Larsson E(2001)Fungal molecular evolution: gene trees and geologic time Mycota 7B 229-60
[10]  
Pennanen T(2017)Early diverging fungi: diversity and impact at the dawn of terrestrial life Annu Rev Microbiol 71 41-1872