Teaching about complex systems is no simple matter: building effective professional development for computer-supported complex systems instruction

被引:0
作者
Susan A. Yoon
Emma Anderson
Jessica Koehler-Yom
Chad Evans
Miyoung Park
Josh Sheldon
Ilana Schoenfeld
Daniel Wendel
Hal Scheintaub
Eric Klopfer
机构
[1] University of Pennsylvania,
[2] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,undefined
来源
Instructional Science | 2017年 / 45卷
关键词
Complex systems; Computer-supported instruction; Professional development; Science education;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The recent next generation science standards in the United States have emphasized learning about complex systems as a core feature of science learning. Over the past 15 years, a number of educational tools and theories have been investigated to help students learn about complex systems; but surprisingly, little research has been devoted to identifying the supports that teachers need to teach about complex systems in the classroom. In this paper, we aim to address this gap in the literature. We describe a 2-year professional development study in which we gathered data on teachers’ abilities and perceptions regarding the delivery of computer-supported complex systems curricula. We present results across the 2 years of the project and demonstrate the need for particular instructional supports to improve implementation efforts, including providing differentiated opportunities to build expertise and addressing teacher beliefs about whether computational-model construction belongs in the science classroom. Results from students’ classroom experiences and learning over the 2 years are offered to further illustrate the impact of these instructional supports.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 121
页数:22
相关论文
共 74 条
[21]  
Yoon KS(2006)Urban public high school teachers’ beliefs about science learner characteristics: Implications for curriculum Urban Education 41 506-532
[22]  
Gerard LF(2009)Efficacy of two different instructional methods involving complex ecological content International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 7 315-337
[23]  
Varma K(2005)The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations Cognition and Instruction 23 23-55
[24]  
Corliss SB(2012)Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature International Journal of Science Education 34 1337-1370
[25]  
Linn M(1997)ScienceWare’s Model-It: Technology to support authentic science inquiry The Journal 25 54-57
[26]  
Hmelo-Silver CE(2008)Software-realized inquiry support for cultivating a disciplinary stance Pragmatics & Cognition 16 307-355
[27]  
Marathe S(2008)Targeted support for using technology-enhanced science inquiry modules Journal of Science Education and Technology 17 341-356
[28]  
Liu L(2006)Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—an embodied modeling approach Cognition and Instruction 24 171-209
[29]  
Hmelo-Silver CE(2013)Professional development for science teachers Science 340 310-313
[30]  
Pfeffer MG(2008)An evolutionary approach to harnessing complex systems thinking in the science and technology classroom International Journal of Science Education 30 1-32