Enamel matrix derivative alone or in combination with a bioactive glass in wide intrabony defects

被引:0
作者
Bahar Kuru
Selçuk Yılmaz
Kılıçaslan Argın
Ülkü Noyan
机构
[1] Marmara University,Dental Faculty, Department of Periodontology
[2] Yeditepe University,Dental Faculty, Department of Periodontology
来源
Clinical Oral Investigations | 2006年 / 10卷
关键词
Intrabony defects; Periodontal regeneration; Enamel matrix protein derivative; Bone grafts; Bioactive glass;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This controlled clinical study investigated the clinical and radiographic outcome of wide intrabony periodontal defects treated by enamel matrix derivatives alone or in combination with a bioactive glass over a period of 8 months. Twenty-three chronic periodontitis patients, who received initial therapy and had radiographical interproximal defects with an associated probing depth of 6 mm or more and an intrabony component of at least 4 mm, were included. Each of the patients, contributing at least one intrabony defect, was treated with either enamel matrix derivative alone (group 1, n=10) or the combination (group 2, n=13). In both groups, all clinical and radiographical parameters were improved. Groups 1 and 2 presented a mean pocket reduction of 5.03±0.89 and 5.73±0.80 mm, recession of 0.97±0.24 and 0.56±0.18 mm, relative attachment gain of 4.06±1.06 and 5.17±0.85 mm, and radiographic bone gain of 2.15±0.42 and 2.76±0.69 mm, respectively. An intergroup comparison revealed significant differences for all of the parameters, yielding a more favorable outcome towards the combined approach. Within the limits of the study, both treatments resulted in marked clinical and radiographical improvements, but combined treatment seemed to enhance the results in the treatment of wide intrabony defects.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 234
页数:7
相关论文
共 203 条
[31]  
Donos N(2000)Treatment of intrabony defects with enamel matrix proteins and guided tissue regeneration. An experimental study in monkeys J Clin Periodontol 27 466-472
[32]  
Sculean A(2001)Treatment of intrabony defects with enamel matrix proteins and guided tissue regeneration. A prospective controlled clinical study J Clin Periodontol 28 397-403
[33]  
Glavind L(2002)Clinical evaluation of an enamel matrix derivative combined with a bioactive glass for the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in humans J Clin Periodontol 73 401-408
[34]  
Reich E(2002)Presence of an enamel matrix protein derivative on human teeth following periodontal surgery Clin Oral Investig 6 183-187
[35]  
Karring T(2003)Clinical and histologic evaluation of human intrabony defects treated with an enamel matrix protein derivative combined with a bovine derived xenograft Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 23 47-55
[36]  
Fetner A(2005)Healing of human intrabony defects following regenerative periodontal therapy with an enemal matrix protein derivative alone and combinated with a bioactive glass J Clin Periodontol 32 111-117
[37]  
Hartigan M(2005)Clinical and histologic evaluation of an enamel matrix protein derivative combined with a bioactive glass for the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in humans Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 25 139-147
[38]  
Low S(1964)Periodontal disease in pregnancy (II). Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal conditioning Acta Odontol Scand 22 121-135
[39]  
Froum SJ(2005)Suture selection for optimal flap closure and tissue healing. Perio-implant showcase Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 16 2-3
[40]  
Weinberg MA(2000)Comparison of treatments of intrabony defects with enamel matrix derivative, guided tissue regeneration with a nonresorbable membrane and Widman modified flap. A pilot study J Clin Periodontol 27 603-610