Differential pathways to generic skills development of male and female college students in Korea

被引:0
作者
Byung Shik Rhee
Sooji Kim
机构
[1] Yonsei University,Department of Education, College of Educational Sciences
[2] Yonsei University,Center for Global Higher Education Research
来源
Asia Pacific Education Review | 2012年 / 13卷
关键词
College impact; Generic skills development; Student development; Gender difference; Involvement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study analyzed a stratified random sample of 1,707 senior students at 60 four-year universities in South Korea to explore the gender-specific pathways to Korean students’ development of generic skills—analytical thinking and problem-solving skills. Multiple regression analyses were performed to investigate the involvement factors differential effects on the development of students’ generic skills. The findings suggest that college student involvement plays a critical role in developing the important generic skills. Furthermore, male and female students do have different routes to the development of such skills. In the case of Korean students, at 4-year institutions of higher education, male students tend to develop generic skills more through formal and independent activities in and out of the classroom, whereas female students do so typically in an informal and interdependent way. These results call for additional scholarly investigation into gender influence on college impact and gender-dependent activities during college; moreover, they encourage institutions of higher education to adopt more gender-specific approaches to relevant institutional policies and practices.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 690
页数:13
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Allison PD(2002)Missing data: Quantitative applications in the social sciences British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 55 193-196
[2]  
Astin AW(1984)Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education Journal of College Student Personnel 25 297-308
[3]  
Astin AW(2009)Multi-campus studies of college impact: Which statistical method is appropriate? Research in Higher Education 50 354-367
[4]  
Denson N(1976)Biographical and educational correlates of graduate and professional school admissions test scores Educational and Psychological Measurement 36 415-420
[5]  
Baird LL(1996)Critical thinking and self-efficacy in autodidactic learning: The effects of program type, self-esteem, and program characteristics Dissertation Abstracts International 16 2551A-25
[6]  
Beckett R(1990)Expected and unexpected benefits derived from student organizations Business Education Forum 44 24-352
[7]  
Beilke M. M.(2001)Developing performance indicators for assessing classroom teaching practices and student learning: The case of engineering Research in Higher Education 42 327-34
[8]  
Cabrera AF(2002)Collaborative learning: Its impact on college students’ development and diversity Journal of College Student Development 43 20-32
[9]  
Colbeck CL(2006)Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages Research in Higher Education 47 1-195
[10]  
Terenzini PT(2011)A gendered perspective on student involvement in collegiate clubs and organizations in Christian higher education Christian Higher Education 10 166-301