Assessment of HER2 using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update for invasive breast cancer: a critical look at cases classified as HER2 2+ by immunohistochemistry

被引:0
作者
Valerie J. Taylor
Penny J. Barnes
Sean C. Godwin
Gillian C. Bethune
机构
[1] Dalhousie University,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
[2] Nova Scotia Health Authority,Department of Biology
[3] Dalhousie University,undefined
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2021年 / 479卷
关键词
ASCO/CAP guidelines; HER2 testing; Invasive breast cancer; HER2 immunohistochemistry; Equivocal;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In 2018, the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists revised the criteria for HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) equivocal (2+) classification in their updated guideline. We reviewed invasive breast cancer specimens originally classified as equivocal (2+) under the 2018 guideline that underwent HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing from August 2018 to August 2019 at our Canadian reference hospital to investigate cases with ambiguous staining patterns between the 1+ and 2+ definitions. Demographics, pathologic features, and pre-analytic conditions were recorded. The H&E and corresponding HER2 IHC slides were reviewed to confirm tumor type and grade, and classify as HER2 indeterminate, 0, 1+, 2+, or “Intermediate” (staining features between the 1+ and 2+ classifications). FISH testing was performed on 289 cases and 273 met inclusion criteria. The FISH-amplified rate was 12.1%. Upon IHC review, 44.7% (122/273) of cases were reclassified as Intermediate. These cases had incomplete staining with moderate intensity (43/122, 35.3%) and/or <10% complete weak or moderate staining (102/122, 83.6%). Intermediate cases had a significantly lower frequency of amplified FISH results than 2+ cases (p < 0.0001), with only four (3.3%) FISH positive and two (1.6%) FISH heterogeneous. Our study highlights the ambiguity in the current guideline for classifying some HER2 IHC patterns. As the rate of gene amplification in these cases was low (4.9%), we recommend adhering to the 2018 HER2 2+ criteria for reflex FISH testing. However, cases with <10% moderate complete staining and certain heterogeneous patterns warrant special consideration. Further descriptive clarification of 1+ criteria is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 31
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] HER2 status in breast cancer: changes in guidelines and complicating factors for interpretation
    Ahn, Soomin
    Woo, Ji Won
    Lee, Kyoungyul
    Park, So Yeon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 54 (01) : 34 - 44
  • [22] Model of tumor-associated epigenetic changes of HER2, ER, and PgR expression in invasive breast cancer phenotypes
    Kurbel, Sven
    [J]. TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (04) : 2011 - 2017
  • [23] Well-differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in-situ hybridization testing?
    Bethune, Gillian C.
    Pettit, Alexandra S. L.
    van Zanten, Daniel Veldhuijzen
    Barnes, Penelope J.
    [J]. HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (06) : 966 - 974
  • [24] Negative estrogen-receptor invasive breast carcinoma: mammographic aspects, correlations with HER2/neu oncoprotein status
    Enache, Dana Elena
    Georgescu, Claudia Valentina
    Patrana, Nicoleta
    [J]. ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY AND EMBRYOLOGY, 2012, 53 (03) : 755 - 762
  • [25] KRT15 in early breast cancer screening and correlation with HER2 positivity, pathological grade and N stage
    Zhang, Zijing
    Wang, Hongying
    Jin, Yiting
    Zhou, Jian
    Chu, Chengyu
    Tang, Feng
    Zou, Liping
    Zou, Qiang
    [J]. BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 17 (12) : 553 - 562
  • [26] Prognostic significance of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2/neu, Ki-67, and nm23 expression in patients with invasive breast cancer
    Cubukcu, E.
    Kanat, O.
    Olmez, O. Fatih
    Kabul, S.
    Canhoroz, M.
    Avci, N.
    Deligonul, A.
    Hartavi, M.
    Cubukcu, S.
    Olmez, F.
    Kurt, E.
    Evrensel, T.
    Gokgoz, S.
    Manavoglu, O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUON, 2013, 18 (02): : 359 - 365
  • [27] Validity of immunohistochemistry method in predicting HER-2 gene status and association of clinicopathological variables with it in invasive breast cancer patients
    Gheybi, Mohammad Kazzem
    Baradaran, Azar
    Mohajeri, Mohammad Reza
    Ostovar, Afshin
    Hajalikhani, Parvaneh
    Farrokhi, Shokrollah
    [J]. APMIS, 2016, 124 (05) : 365 - 371
  • [28] A prediction model for predicting relapsed-free survival of early-stage invasive breast cancer patients with hormone receptor positive based on Ki67, HER2 and TOP2A
    Yuan, Dawei
    Ma, Rulan
    Ye, Haixia
    Liu, Wenbo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2025, 15
  • [29] Equivocal (HER2 IHC 2+) breast carcinomas: gene-protein assay testing reveals association between genetic heterogeneity, individual cell amplification status and potential treatment benefits
    Pekar, Gyula
    Kasselaki, Ionna
    Pekar-Lukacs, Agnes
    Dekany, Csaba
    Hellberg, Dan
    Tot, Tibor
    [J]. HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2019, 74 (02) : 300 - 310