Assessment of HER2 using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update for invasive breast cancer: a critical look at cases classified as HER2 2+ by immunohistochemistry

被引:0
|
作者
Valerie J. Taylor
Penny J. Barnes
Sean C. Godwin
Gillian C. Bethune
机构
[1] Dalhousie University,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
[2] Nova Scotia Health Authority,Department of Biology
[3] Dalhousie University,undefined
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2021年 / 479卷
关键词
ASCO/CAP guidelines; HER2 testing; Invasive breast cancer; HER2 immunohistochemistry; Equivocal;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In 2018, the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists revised the criteria for HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) equivocal (2+) classification in their updated guideline. We reviewed invasive breast cancer specimens originally classified as equivocal (2+) under the 2018 guideline that underwent HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing from August 2018 to August 2019 at our Canadian reference hospital to investigate cases with ambiguous staining patterns between the 1+ and 2+ definitions. Demographics, pathologic features, and pre-analytic conditions were recorded. The H&E and corresponding HER2 IHC slides were reviewed to confirm tumor type and grade, and classify as HER2 indeterminate, 0, 1+, 2+, or “Intermediate” (staining features between the 1+ and 2+ classifications). FISH testing was performed on 289 cases and 273 met inclusion criteria. The FISH-amplified rate was 12.1%. Upon IHC review, 44.7% (122/273) of cases were reclassified as Intermediate. These cases had incomplete staining with moderate intensity (43/122, 35.3%) and/or <10% complete weak or moderate staining (102/122, 83.6%). Intermediate cases had a significantly lower frequency of amplified FISH results than 2+ cases (p < 0.0001), with only four (3.3%) FISH positive and two (1.6%) FISH heterogeneous. Our study highlights the ambiguity in the current guideline for classifying some HER2 IHC patterns. As the rate of gene amplification in these cases was low (4.9%), we recommend adhering to the 2018 HER2 2+ criteria for reflex FISH testing. However, cases with <10% moderate complete staining and certain heterogeneous patterns warrant special consideration. Further descriptive clarification of 1+ criteria is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 31
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of HER2 using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update for invasive breast cancer: a critical look at cases classified as HER2 2+by immunohistochemistry
    Taylor, Valerie J.
    Barnes, Penny J.
    Godwin, Sean C.
    Bethune, Gillian C.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2021, 479 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [2] Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Updates on HER2 Assessment in Breast Cancer with HER2 Immunohistochemistry Equivocal Results
    Wen, Hannah
    Ventura, Katia
    Xu, Jin
    Ross, Dara
    Dang, Chau
    Robson, Mark
    Norton, Larry
    Morrow, Monica
    Brogi, Edi
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2019, 99
  • [3] Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Updates on HER2 Assessment in Breast Cancer with HER2 Immunohistochemistry Equivocal Results
    Wen, Hannah
    Ventura, Katia
    Xu, Jin
    Ross, Dara
    Dang, Chau
    Robson, Mark
    Norton, Larry
    Morrow, Monica
    Brogi, Edi
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32
  • [4] Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guidelines update for HER2 testing by FISH in breast cancer
    Xu, Bin
    Shen, Jianguo
    Guo, Wenhao
    Zhao, Wenhe
    Zhuang, Yiyu
    Wang, Linbo
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 215 (02) : 251 - 255
  • [5] Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Focused Update
    Gordian-Arroyo, Adlin M.
    Zynger, Debra L.
    Tozbikian, Gary H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2019, 152 (01) : 17 - 26
  • [6] HER2 targeted therapy and outcome in HER2equivocal cases after 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline modification
    Crespo, James
    Sun, Hongxia
    Wu, Jimin
    Ding, Qingqing
    Tang, Guilin
    Robinson, Melissa
    Chen, Hui
    Sahin, Aysegul A.
    Lim, Bora
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [7] Effect of the 2013 ASCO-CAP HER2 Testing Guideline on the Management of IHC/HER2 2+Invasive Breast Cancer
    Yamada, Mai
    Kubo, Makoto
    Yamamoto, Hidetaka
    Yamashita, Nami
    Kai, Masaya
    Zaguirre, Karen
    Kaneshiro, Kazuhisa
    Shimazaki, Akiko
    Hayashi, Saori
    Kawaji, Hitomi
    Mori, Masaki
    Oda, Yoshinao
    Nakamura, Masafumi
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (08) : 4143 - 4149
  • [8] Histologic analysis according to HER2 gene status in HER2 2 + invasive breast cancer: a study of 280 cases comparing ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guideline recommendations
    Hye Won Hwang
    Soon Auck Hong
    Seok Jin Nam
    Seok Won Kim
    Jeong Eon Lee
    Jong-Han Yu
    Se Kyung Lee
    Soo Youn Cho
    Eun Yoon Cho
    Virchows Archiv, 2022, 480 : 749 - 758
  • [9] Characteristics of HER2 FISH-Equivocal Breast Cancers and the Impacts on HER2 Status of 2018 ASCO/CAP Guideline
    Kong, Hui
    Bai, Qianming
    Lu, Hongfen
    Zhou, Xiaoyan
    Yang, Wentao
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2019, 99
  • [10] Characteristics of HER2 FISH-Equivocal Breast Cancers and the Impacts on HER2 Status of 2018 ASCO/CAP Guideline
    Kong, Hui
    Bai, Qianming
    Lu, Hongfen
    Zhou, Xiaoyan
    Yang, Wentao
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32