Green fuel from coal via Fischer–Tropsch process: scenario of optimal condition of process and modelling

被引：5

作者：

Atashi H. ^{[1
]}

Veiskarami S. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan

来源：

International Journal of Coal Science and Technology | 2018年 / 5卷 / 02期

关键词：

Biomass; Fischer–Tropsch process; Iron based catalyst; Oil derivatives; Selectivity model;

D O I：

10.1007/s40789-018-0204-7

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Extracting, transportation and the using from fossil fuels can damage to the hydrosphere, the biosphere and the Earth’s atmosphere. But humans always need to this valuable substance. The production of oil derivatives by means of forest waste and coal through the Fischer–Tropsch process is an appropriate solution for the cleanliness of all parts of the environment. For the production of favorite products by the synthesis of Fischer–Tropsch, the performance of the catalyst under different operating conditions should be predictable. For this reason, in this paper, eight mathematical models were determined for the selectivity of five products of methane, light hydrocarbons, gasoline, diesel and wax based on three factors of reduction temperature, time on stream, and H2/CO ratio inlet gas on iron-based catalyst. The results showed that the reduction temperature factor had the most effective on the selectivity of hydrocarbon products, exception diesel, so that the increase of the reduction temperature led to increase of the selectivity of methane, light hydrocarbons, gasoline and reduce of the degree of selectivity of the wax and vice versa. For the diesel selectivity, factor of the H2/CO ratio inlet gas was the most effective than other factors. © 2018, The Author(s).

引用

页码：230 / 243

页数：13

共 30 条

[11]

Hao Q.-L., Liu F.-X., Wang H., Chang J., Zhang C.-H., Bai L., Xiang H.-W., Li Y.-W., Yi F., Xu B.-F., Effect of reduction temperature on a spray-dried iron-based catalyst for slurry Fischer–Tropsch synthesis, J Mol Catal A Chem, 261, pp. 104-111, (2007)

[12]

Landau M.V., Vidruk R., Herskowitz M., Sustainable production of bioparaffins in a crude oil refinery, ChemSusChem, 7, pp. 785-794, (2014)

[13]

Li J., Cheng X., Zhang C., Yang Y., Li Y., Effects of alkali on iron-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: CO chemisorptions study, J Mol Catal A Chem, 396, pp. 174-180, (2015)

[14]

Liu Y., Ersen O., Meny C., Luck F., Pham-Huu C., Fischer–Tropsch reaction on a thermally conductive and reusable silicon carbide support, ChemSusChem, 7, pp. 1218-1239, (2014)

[15]

Lueking A.D., Cole M.W., Energy and mass balances related to climate change and remediation, Sci Total Environ, 590, pp. 416-429, (2017)

[16]

Ma W., Jacobs G., Graham U.M., Davis B.H., Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: effect of K loading on the water–gas shift reaction and liquid hydrocarbon formation rate over precipitated iron catalysts, Top Catal, 57, pp. 561-571, (2014)

[17]

Ma W., Jacobs G., Sparks D.E., Shafer W.D., Hamdeh H.H., Hopps S.D., Pendyala V.R.R., Hu Y., Xiao Q., Davis B.H., Effect of H<sub>2</sub>S in syngas on the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis performance of a precipitated iron catalyst, Appl Catal A, 513, pp. 127-137, (2016)

[18]

Ngantsoue-Hoc W., Zhang Y., O'Brien R.J., Luo M., Davis B.H., Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: activity and selectivity for group I alkali promoted iron-based catalysts, Appl Catal A, 236, pp. 77-89, (2002)

[19]

Noureldin M.M., Bao B., Elbashir N.O., El-Halwagi M.M., Benchmarking, insights, and potential for improvement of Fischer–Tropsch-based biomass-to-liquid technology, Clean Technol Environ Policy, 16, pp. 37-44, (2014)

[20]

Rafati M., Wang L., Shahbazi A., Effect of silica and alumina promoters on co-precipitated Fe–Cu–K based catalysts for the enhancement of CO<sub>2</sub> utilization during Fischer–Tropsch synthesis, J CO2 Util, 12, pp. 34-42, (2015)

← 1 2 3 →