Energetic effects of stimulus intensity on prolonged simple reaction-time performance

被引:0
作者
Robert Langner
Klaus Willmes
Anjan Chatterjee
Simon B. Eickhoff
Walter Sturm
机构
[1] RWTH Aachen University,Neuropsychology Section, Department of Neurology
[2] RWTH Aachen University,Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
[3] University of Pennsylvania,Department of Neurology, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience
[4] Institute of Neurosciences and Medicine,Research Centre Jülich
[5] Universitätsklinikum Aachen,LFG Neuropsychologie, Neurologische Klinik
来源
Psychological Research | 2010年 / 74卷
关键词
Presentation Mode; Mental Fatigue; Task Engagement; Mindlessness Theory; Vigilance Decrement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The efficiency of cognition is modulated by energetic factors like effort, fatigue or circadian variation, which affect even the most basic cognitive operations. For instance, speeded detection in simple reaction-time (SRT) tasks usually slows down over time. The literature suggests that either mindlessness due to routinization or mental fatigue due to attentional resource depletion might underlie this decrement. We tested these assumptions in three 25-min visual SRT tasks using easy-to-detect high-intensity and hard-to-detect low-intensity stimuli presented in both blocked and mixed fashion. Mindlessness theory predicts that less monotonous stimulation (i.e. the mixed presentation) would mitigate the time-related decrement for high- and low-intensity stimuli alike, whereas resource-depletion theory predicts opposite effects of mixed presentation on high- versus low-intensity stimuli. Indeed, stimulus intensity and presentation mode cross-interacted significantly, indicating that the performance decline was steeper for high-intensity stimuli but less steep for low-intensity stimuli during mixed compared to blocked presentation, respectively. These results strongly suggest that the time-related efficiency decrement during prolonged SRT performance is related to accumulating mental fatigue. A conjecture is put forward that explains both resource depletion and mindlessness from the perspective of self-regulation. Our study underscores the need to incorporate energetic factors into models of cognition to facilitate their translation into real-world applications.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 512
页数:13
相关论文
共 227 条
[11]  
Milham MP(1986)Routes to action in reaction time tasks Psychological Research 48 169-177
[12]  
Atchley RA(2008)Conflict-triggered goal shielding: response conflicts attenuate background monitoring for prospective memory cues Psychological Science 19 25-32
[13]  
Cohen NJ(2003)The vigilance decrement reflects limitations in effortful attention not mindlessness Human Factors 45 349-359
[14]  
Webb A(1986)Effect of small doses of alcohol and signal intensity on simple auditory reaction time in a monotonous test situation Perceptual and Motor Skills 63 539-543
[15]  
Wszalek T(1989)A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention Human Factors 31 519-537
[16]  
Kramer AF(2005)Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance British Journal of Psychology 96 249-261
[17]  
Liang Z(2008)Signal salience and the mindlessness theory of vigilance Acta Psychologica 129 18-25
[18]  
Barad V(1998)Preparing to react in the absence of uncertainty: I. New perspectives on simple reaction time British Journal of Psychology 89 531-554
[19]  
Gullett D(1997)Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: a cognitive-energetical framework Biological Psychology 45 73-93
[20]  
Shah C(2003)Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 47-70