Energetic effects of stimulus intensity on prolonged simple reaction-time performance

被引:0
作者
Robert Langner
Klaus Willmes
Anjan Chatterjee
Simon B. Eickhoff
Walter Sturm
机构
[1] RWTH Aachen University,Neuropsychology Section, Department of Neurology
[2] RWTH Aachen University,Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
[3] University of Pennsylvania,Department of Neurology, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience
[4] Institute of Neurosciences and Medicine,Research Centre Jülich
[5] Universitätsklinikum Aachen,LFG Neuropsychologie, Neurologische Klinik
来源
Psychological Research | 2010年 / 74卷
关键词
Presentation Mode; Mental Fatigue; Task Engagement; Mindlessness Theory; Vigilance Decrement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The efficiency of cognition is modulated by energetic factors like effort, fatigue or circadian variation, which affect even the most basic cognitive operations. For instance, speeded detection in simple reaction-time (SRT) tasks usually slows down over time. The literature suggests that either mindlessness due to routinization or mental fatigue due to attentional resource depletion might underlie this decrement. We tested these assumptions in three 25-min visual SRT tasks using easy-to-detect high-intensity and hard-to-detect low-intensity stimuli presented in both blocked and mixed fashion. Mindlessness theory predicts that less monotonous stimulation (i.e. the mixed presentation) would mitigate the time-related decrement for high- and low-intensity stimuli alike, whereas resource-depletion theory predicts opposite effects of mixed presentation on high- versus low-intensity stimuli. Indeed, stimulus intensity and presentation mode cross-interacted significantly, indicating that the performance decline was steeper for high-intensity stimuli but less steep for low-intensity stimuli during mixed compared to blocked presentation, respectively. These results strongly suggest that the time-related efficiency decrement during prolonged SRT performance is related to accumulating mental fatigue. A conjecture is put forward that explains both resource depletion and mindlessness from the perspective of self-regulation. Our study underscores the need to incorporate energetic factors into models of cognition to facilitate their translation into real-world applications.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 512
页数:13
相关论文
共 227 条
[1]  
Aglioti S(1997)Influence of stimulus salience and attentional demands on visual search patterns in hemispatial neglect Brain and Cognition 34 388-403
[2]  
Smania N(2009)The neural basis of sustained and transient attentional control in young adults with ADHD Neuropsychologia 47 3095-3104
[3]  
Barbieri C(2000)Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional ‘set’: evidence from fMRI Cognitive Brain Research 10 1-9
[4]  
Corbetta M(2007)The strength model of self-control Current Directions in Psychological Science 16 351-355
[5]  
Banich MT(1966)Reaction time as a measure of perceptual vigilance Psychological Bulletin 65 291-304
[6]  
Burgess GC(2005)Confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 1 42-45
[7]  
Depue BE(2005)Neurophysiological markers of alert responding during goal-directed behavior: A high-density electrical mapping study NeuroImage 27 587-601
[8]  
Ruzic L(2004)Behavioural and physiological impairments of sustained attention after traumatic brain injury Cognitive Brain Research 20 403-414
[9]  
Bidwell LC(2008)That’s what task sets are for: shielding against irrelevant information Psychological Research 72 355-361
[10]  
Banich MT(2008)Arousal and attention: Self-chosen stimulation optimizes cortical excitability and minimizes compensatory effort Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 1443-1453