Use of thermal units to estimate corn crop coefficients under semiarid climatic conditions

被引:0
作者
A. Martínez-Cob
机构
[1] Estación Experimental Aula Dei (CSIC),
来源
Irrigation Science | 2008年 / 26卷
关键词
Root Mean Square Error; Phenological Stage; Crop Coefficient; Minimum Relative Humidity; Local Calibration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Two crop coefficient equations were derived as a function of fraction of thermal units from lysimeter measured corn evapotranspiration (ETc-lys) during 1997 and 1998, and reference evapotranspiration obtained from: (a) lysimeter measurements (Kcmes) or FAO Penman-Monteith (ETo-PM) estimates (Kcest-PM). For validation, corn evapotranspiration (ETc-est) was estimated in 2005 and 2006 from ETo-PM and: (a) the equation for Kcmes with (ETc-est-lyslc) or without (ETc-est-lys) locally calibrated ETo-PM; (b) the equation for Kcest-PM; and (c) the FAO approach (ETc-est-FAO). The ETc-est_lys estimates showed the lowest bias (0.09 mm day−1); the ETc-est-PM and ETc-est-FAO, the highest (0.50-0.51 mm day−1). However, the root mean square error (RMSE, 1.23–1.27 mm day−1) and the index of agreement (IA, around 0.94) of the ETc-est-lys, ETc-est-lyslc and ETc-est-PM were similar. Therefore, ETc-est-lys is recommended although the ETc-est-lyslc was similarly accurate. The ETc-est-PM is less recommended due to poorer bias and systematic mean square error, and a general underestimation except for low corn ET values. For real time irrigation scheduling, the ETc-est-FAO should be avoided as RMSE (1.35 mm day−1), IA (0.93) and bias were slightly worse, corn ET was overestimated but for high values, and the length of the four phenological stages must be known in advance.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 345
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Amos B(1989)Fraction of thermal units as the base for evapotranspiration crop coefficient curve for corn Agron J 81 713-717
[2]  
Stone LR(2005)Reference ET estimation in a highly advective semi-arid environment J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 131 147-163
[3]  
Bark LD(1999)Competition between maize and Weed Res 39 225-240
[4]  
Berengena J(1992) in an irrigated field under semi-arid conditions Agron J 84 717-723
[5]  
Gavilán P(1998)Evapotranspiration, crop coefficients, and leaching fractions of irrigated desert turfgrass systems California Agric 52 16-21
[6]  
Cavero J(1999)New crop coefficients estimate water use of vegetables, row crops Trans ASAE 42 927-936
[7]  
Zaragoza C(2003)Basal crop coefficients and water use for early maturity cotton Agric Water Manage 59 239-254
[8]  
Suso ML(2000)Crop coefficient and ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration of winter wheat and maize in a semi-humid region Agron J 92 345-352
[9]  
Pardo A(2003)Comparing simulated and measured values using mean squared deviation and its components Agric Water Manage 60 181-198
[10]  
Devitt DA(2001)Fixed versus variable bulk canopy resistance for reference evapotranspiration estimation using the Penman–Monteith equation under semiarid conditions Irrig Sci 20 175-188