Barriers to university–industry collaboration in an emerging market: Firm-level evidence from Turkey

被引:0
|
作者
Timo Kleiner-Schaefer
Kerstin J. Schaefer
机构
[1] Leibniz Universität Hannover,Institute of Economic and Cultural Geography
[2] Philipps-Universität Marburg,Department for Structural Development, Research and Transfer
[3] London School of Economics and Political Science,Department of Geography and Environment
来源
The Journal of Technology Transfer | 2022年 / 47卷
关键词
Innovation; Research and development; University–industry collaboration; Barrier; Emerging market; Turkey; O30; O32; O38;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
University-industry collaborations (UICs) are one of the main sources of external knowledge and technologies for industrial firms, particularly in the context of emerging markets (EMs) and firm development. It is thus highly relevant to identify potential barriers internal to the firm as well as in the regional innovation system that might prevent firms from using UICs for innovation, in particular in an EM context. In order to address this issue, we conduct a firm-level study of the R&D-related segment of the manufacturing industry in Istanbul. Logistic regression analysis is used to test the effect of potential barriers on using UICs for innovative activities. With this approach, we are able to identify barriers that prevent innovation-related UICs and thus form a bottleneck to collaborations in the first place. Our findings show that lack of information about UIC opportunities as well as lack of financial support for UICs are the most relevant barriers that inhibit firms’ usage of UICs for innovation. This firm-level evidence points out the importance of university technology transfer offices in regional innovation systems and for fruitful UICs. We further find that administrative barriers have no significant effect, while barriers related to trust and skill matching with scientific partners even have a reverse effect to what we would have expected from the literature. This finding might point towards an effect of perceived versus deterring barriers that has been observed in innovation studies before and might be relevant for studying UICs as well.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 905
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modes of innovation in an emerging economy: a firm-level analysis from Mexico
    Carrillo-Carrillo, Francisco
    Alcalde-Heras, Henar
    INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 22 (03): : 334 - 352
  • [32] Corruption, innovation and firm growth: firm-level evidence from Egypt and Tunisia
    Micheline Goedhuys
    Pierre Mohnen
    Tamer Taha
    Eurasian Business Review, 2016, 6 : 299 - 322
  • [33] Corruption, innovation and firm growth: firm-level evidence from Egypt and Tunisia
    Goedhuys, Micheline
    Mohnen, Pierre
    Taha, Tamer
    EURASIAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2016, 6 (03) : 299 - 322
  • [34] Tax credits and total factor productivity: firm-level evidence from Taiwan
    Huang, Chia-Hui
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2015, 40 (06): : 932 - 947
  • [35] Firm-Level Investment and Exporting: New Empirical Evidence from Ghana and Tanzania
    Esaku, Stephen
    Krugell, Waldo
    INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2020, 34 (01) : 125 - 143
  • [36] International cooperation on innovation: Firm-level evidence from two European countries
    de Faria, Pedro
    Schmidt, Tobias
    INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2012, 14 (03): : 303 - 323
  • [37] Globalization, technological change and labor demand: a firm-level analysis for Turkey
    Meschi, Elena
    Taymaz, Erol
    Vivarelli, Marco
    REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2016, 152 (04) : 655 - 680
  • [38] Energy efficiency and exporting: Evidence from firm-level data
    Roy, Jayjit
    Yasar, Mahmut
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 52 : 127 - 135
  • [39] The role of intangibles in firm-level productivity - evidence from Germany
    Roth, Felix
    Sen, Ali
    Rammer, Christian
    INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2023, 30 (02) : 263 - 285
  • [40] Digital Finance and Pollution: Firm-Level Evidence From China
    Wei, Yueling
    Wang, Lingqi
    Zhang, Hongsheng
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 31 (06)