Leadership and decision-making practices in public versus private universities in Pakistan

被引:0
作者
A. Zulfqar
M. Valcke
G. Devos
M. Tuytens
A. Shahzad
机构
[1] Ghent University,Department of Educational Studies
[2] Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan,Department of Education
[3] The Islamia University Bahawalpur,Department of Education Training
来源
Asia Pacific Education Review | 2016年 / 17卷
关键词
Transformational leadership; Participative decision-making; Public/private; Universities; Qualitative study;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of this study is to examine differences in leadership and decision-making practices in public and private universities in Pakistan, with a focus on transformational leadership (TL) and participative decision-making (PDM). We conducted semi-structured interviews with 46 deans and heads of department from two public and two private universities in Pakistan. Our findings indicate that leadership and decision-making practices are different in public and private universities. While differences were observed in all six types of TL-behaviour, the following three approaches emerged to be crucial in both public and private universities: (1) articulating a vision, (2) fostering the acceptance of group goals, and (3) high-performance expectations. In terms of PDM, deans and heads of department in public and private universities adopt a collaborative approach. However, on a practical level this approach is limited to teacher- and student-related matters. Overall, our findings suggest that the leadership and decision-making practices in Pakistani public and private universities are transformational and participative in nature.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 159
页数:12
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Aktas M(2015)Cultural tightness–looseness and perceptions of effective leadership Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29 477-491
[2]  
Gelfand M(2015)Leadership styles at Syrian higher education: What matters for organizational learning at public and private universities? International Journal of Educational Management 64 1810-1830
[3]  
Hanges P(2013)Measuring the relative efficiency of quality management practices in Turkish public and private universities Journal of the Operational Research Society 152 17-42
[4]  
Ayoubi R(2012)The shared leadership process in decision-making teams The Journal of Social Psychology 5 208-214
[5]  
Khalifa B(2010)Comparative study of full range leadership model among faculty members in public and private sector higher education institutes and universities International Journal of Business and Management 39 97-122
[6]  
Bayraktar E(2002)Public and private management: What’s the difference? Journal of Management Studies 32 693-710
[7]  
Tatoglu E(2007)Effective leadership in higher education: A literature review Studies in Higher Education 20 307-319
[8]  
Zaim S(2014)Impact of accreditation on public and private universities: A comparative study Tertiary Education and Management 34 84-104
[9]  
Bergman JZ(2014)Borrowing for college: A comparison of long-term debt financing between public and private, nonprofit institutions of higher education Public Budgeting & Finance 20 801-826
[10]  
Rentsch RJ(2010)Personnel flexibility and red tape in public and nonprofit organizations Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 123-136