Scale-sensitive integration of ecosystem services in urban planning

被引：21
作者：
Faehnle M. [1 ,4 ]
Söderman T. [1 ]
Schulman H. [2 ]
Lehvävirta S. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, P.O. Box 140, Helsinki
[2] Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
[3] Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
[4] Helsinki University Centre for Environment (HENVI), Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
来源：
GeoJournal | 2015年 / 80卷 / 03期
关键词：
Green space; Scaling; Spatial planning; Sustainable cities;
D O I：
10.1007/s10708-014-9560-z
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Maintaining green infrastructure as a source of ecosystem services is a key challenge for sustainability of urban regions. In order to support sustainable service provision, planning of this infrastructure needs to consider complex ecological and social processes operating in different timescales and varying spatially within a region. However, such scalar approaches to planning have been rare. This article addresses ways to improve scale-sensitivity in planning of urban green infrastructure, with a focus on holistic considerations of conditions for sustainable reproduction of benefits from ecosystem services. Based on information from the literature, we develop a spatially sensitized conceptual framework for addressing provision of ecosystem services in urban regions. We discuss the application of spatially sensitized scalar approaches from the perspectives of scale dimensions, an area, a service, and a green infrastructure element. We conclude that spatially sensitized scalar frameworks hold promise for addressing the provision of ecosystem services as part of planning for urban sustainability. Research on production of scales in various contexts would further enhance their usability. © 2014, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码：411 / 425
页数：14
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Ahern J., From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world, Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 4, pp. 341-343, (2011)
[2]  
Andersson E., Ahrne K., Pyykonen M., Elmqvist T., Patterns and scale relations among urbanization measures in Stockholm, Sweden, Landscape Ecology, 24, 10, pp. 1331-1339, (2009)
[3]  
Andersson E., Barthel S., Ahrne K., Measuring social-ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services, Ecological Applications, 17, 5, pp. 1267-1278, (2007)
[4]  
Barthel S., Parker J., Ernstson H., Food and green space in cities: a resilience lens on gardens and urban environmental movements, Urban Studies, available online January, 28, (2013)
[5]  
Bastian O., Haase D., Grunewald K., Ecosystem properties, potentials and services—The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example, Ecological Indicators, 21, pp. 7-16, (2012)
[6]  
Bendt P., Barthel S., Colding J., Civic greening and environmental learning in public-access community gardens in Berlin, Landscape and Urban Planning, 109, 1, pp. 18-30, (2013)
[7]  
Bolund P., Hunhammar S., Ecosystem services in urban areas, Ecological Economics, 29, 2, pp. 293-301, (1999)
[8]  
Boone C., Cook E., Hall S.J., Grimm N.B., Raish C., Finch D., Nation M., York A., A comparative gradient approach to understanding and managing urban ecosystems, Urban Ecosystems, 15, 4, pp. 795-807, (2012)
[9]  
Boyd E., & Juhola, S, (2014)
[10]  
Calthorpe P., The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American Dream, (1993)
12345678910