The development of emergency medical services benefit score: a European Delphi study

[1] Murphy A(2016)Development of key performance indicators for prehospital emergency care Emerg Med J 33 286-292

[2] Wakai A(2020)The first seven years of nationally organized helicopter emergency medical services in Finland—the data from quality registry Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 28 66-S56

[3] Walsh C(2009)Emergency medical services outcomes research: evaluating the effectiveness of prehospital care Prehosp Emerg Care 6 S52-1259

[4] Saviluoto A(2013)Do pre-hospital anaesthesiologists reliably predict mortality using the NACA severity score? A retrospective cohort study Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 57 1253-565

[5] Björkman J(2017)Evaluating helicopter emergency medical missions: a reliability study of the HEMS benefit and NACA scores Acta Anesthesiol Scand 61 557-409

[6] Olkinuora A(2020)Reliability of prehospital patient classification in helicopter emergency medical service missions BMC Emerg Med 20 42-467

[7] McLean SA(2014)Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies J Clin Epidemiol 67 401-161

[8] Maio RF(2011)A consensus-based template for documenting and reporting in physician-staffed pre-hospital services Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 19 71-431

[9] Spaite DW(2007)Focus on research methods. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations Res Nurs Health 30 459-449

[10] Raatiniemi L(1998)Development of new methods to assess the outcomes of emergency care Acad Emerg Med 5 157-undefined

[1] Murphy A(2016)Development of key performance indicators for prehospital emergency care Emerg Med J 33 286-292

[2] Wakai A(2020)The first seven years of nationally organized helicopter emergency medical services in Finland—the data from quality registry Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 28 66-S56

[3] Walsh C(2009)Emergency medical services outcomes research: evaluating the effectiveness of prehospital care Prehosp Emerg Care 6 S52-1259

[4] Saviluoto A(2013)Do pre-hospital anaesthesiologists reliably predict mortality using the NACA severity score? A retrospective cohort study Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 57 1253-565

[5] Björkman J(2017)Evaluating helicopter emergency medical missions: a reliability study of the HEMS benefit and NACA scores Acta Anesthesiol Scand 61 557-409

[6] Olkinuora A(2020)Reliability of prehospital patient classification in helicopter emergency medical service missions BMC Emerg Med 20 42-467

[7] McLean SA(2014)Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies J Clin Epidemiol 67 401-161

[8] Maio RF(2011)A consensus-based template for documenting and reporting in physician-staffed pre-hospital services Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 19 71-431

[9] Spaite DW(2007)Focus on research methods. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations Res Nurs Health 30 459-449

[10] Raatiniemi L(1998)Development of new methods to assess the outcomes of emergency care Acad Emerg Med 5 157-undefined