Prevalence and natural course of gastroesophageal reflux disease

被引:12
作者
Labenz J. [1 ]
Labenz C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Diakonie Klinikum – Jung-Stilling-Krankenhaus, Wichernstr. 40, Siegen
[2] Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen
来源
Der Gastroenterologe | 2016年 / 11卷 / 2期
关键词
Barrett‘s carcinoma; Barrett‘s esophagus; Endoskopy; Epidemiology; Gastroesophageal reflux disease;
D O I
10.1007/s11377-016-0045-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The epidemiology of a disease, in particular the natural course, is important for treatment planning and monitoring strategies. Objective: Incidence, prevalence, and natural course of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Materials and methods: Selective literature search in the database PubMed. Results: In industrialized countries, approximately 20 % of adults suffer from symptomatic GERD. In addition, asymptomatic esophageal reflux and Barrett esophagus was observed in more than 5 % of the general public in an endoscopic population based study. Spontaneous healing of GERD does occur, but in the majority of cases the disease is chronic. GERD is not a categorical disease. Approximately 25–30 % of patients have endoscopic progression of their disease over time. The cancer risk of Barrett esophagus is estimated to be 0.1–0.15 % per year, which is less than originally assumed. Overall, GERD is not associated with a shortened life expectancy. The epidemiology of extra-esophageal symptoms is largely unknown. Conclusion: GERD is a common disease with a good prognosis with regard to survival. Spontaneous recovery occurs as well as progression of endoscopic lesions. The cancer risk of Barrett esophagus is lower than expected; thus, surveillance should be limited to high-risk patients. © 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 109
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Agreus L., Svardsudd K., Nyren O., Et al., The epidemiology of abdominal symptoms: prevalence and demographic characteristics in a Swedish adult population. A report from the Abdominal Symptom Study, Scand J Gastroenterol, 29, pp. 102-109, (1994)
  • [2] Becher A., Dent J., Systematic review: ageing and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms, oesophageal function and reflux oesophagitis, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 33, pp. 442-454, (2011)
  • [3] Cameron A.J., Lagergren J., Henriksson C., Et al., Gastroesophageal reflux disease in monozygotic and dizygotic twins, Gastroenterology, 122, pp. 55-59, (2002)
  • [4] Curvers W.L., ten Kate F.J., Krishnadath K.K., Et al., Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett´s esophagus: overdiagnosed and underestimated, Am J Gastroenterol, 105, pp. 1523-1530, (2010)
  • [5] El-Serag H.B., Time trends of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5, pp. 17-26, (2007)
  • [6] El-Serag H.B., Sweet S., Winchester C.C., Et al., Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review, Gut, 63, pp. 871-880, (2014)
  • [7] Fass R., Ofman J.J., Gastroesophageal reflux disease – should we adopt a new conceptual framework?, Am J Gastroenterol, 97, pp. 1901-1909, (2002)
  • [8] Ford A.C., Forman D., Bailey A.G., Et al., The natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in the community and its effects on survival: a longitudinal 10-year follow-up study, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 37, pp. 323-331, (2013)
  • [9] Ford A.C., Forman D., Reynolds, Et al., Ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status as risk factors for esophagitis and Barrett´s esophagus, Am J Epidemiol, 162, pp. 454-460, (2005)
  • [10] Fullard M., Kang J.Y., Neild P., Et al., Systematic review: does gastro-oesophageal reflux disease progress?, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 24, pp. 33-45, (2006)