Does smoking influence the clinical outcomes of robotic ventral hernia repair? A propensity score matching analysis study

被引:0
作者
Omar Yusef Kudsi
Georges Kaoukabani
Naseem Bou-Ayash
Fahri Gokcal
机构
[1] Good Samaritan Medical Center,
[2] Tufts University School of Medicine,undefined
[3] Tufts Medical Center,undefined
来源
Journal of Robotic Surgery | 2023年 / 17卷
关键词
Robotic; Smoking; Ventral hernia; Clinical outcomes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of robotic ventral hernia repair (RVHR) between smokers and non-smokers. Data for patients undergoing RVHR between 2012 and 2022 were collected. Patients were assigned to either smoking (+) or smoking (−) groups, according to their smoking status in the last 3 months prior to their procedure. Pre-, intra- and postoperative variables including surgical site occurrences (SSO) and infections (SSI), and hernia recurrence were analyzed after a propensity score matching analysis based on the patients’ demographics and hernia’s characteristics. Each group consisted of 143 patients matched according to their preoperative characteristics. There were no differences in terms of demographics and hernia characteristics. Intraoperative complications occurred at a comparable rate between both groups (p = 0.498). Comprehensive Complication Index® and all complication grades of the Clavien–Dindo classification were similar between both groups. Surgical site occurrences and infections did not differ either [smoking (+) vs. smoking (−): 7.6% vs 5.4%, p = 0.472; 5 vs. 0, p = 0.060, respectively). Rates of SSOs and SSIs that required any intervention (SSOPI) were similar in both groups [smoking (+): 3.1% vs. smoking (−): 0.8%, p = 0.370]. With a mean follow-up of 50 months for the cohort, recurrences rates were also comparable with 7 recorded in the smoking (−) versus 5 in the smoking (+) group (p = 0.215). Our study showed comparable rates of SSOs, SSIs, SSOPIs, and recurrence between smokers and non-smokers following RVHR. Future studies should compare the open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches in smokers.
引用
收藏
页码:2229 / 2236
页数:7
相关论文
共 185 条
[1]  
Bittner JGT(2018)Comparative analysis of open and robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair Surg Endosc 32 727-734
[2]  
Alrefai S(2021)Transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair: open or robotic? Short-term outcomes from a systematic review with meta-analysis Hernia 25 1471-1480
[3]  
Vy M(2012)Modified hernia grading scale to stratify surgical site occurrence after open ventral hernia repairs J Am Coll Surg 215 787-793
[4]  
Mabe M(2010)Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair Surgery 148 544-558
[5]  
Del Prado PAR(2021)Identifying predictors of ventral hernia recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis BJS Open 37 246-253
[6]  
Clingempeel NL(2021)Excess body weight and abdominal hernia Visc Med 14 275-281
[7]  
Bracale U(2020)Robotic ventral hernia repair in octogenarians: perioperative and long-term outcomes J Robot Surg 26 1315-1323
[8]  
Corcione F(2022)Short-term complications after minimally invasive retromuscular ventral hernia repair: no need for preoperative weight loss or smoking cessation? Hernia 147 573-577
[9]  
Neola D(2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies STROBE statement Ann Intern Med 13 407-414
[10]  
Castiglioni S(2009)Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias Hernia 240 205-213