The MMPI-2 symptom validity scale (FBS) is an empirically-validated measure of over-reporting in personal injury litigants and claimants: Reply to William et al. (2009)

被引：12

作者：

Ben-Porath Y.S. ^{[1
]}

Greve K.W. ^{[2
]}

Bianchini K.J. ^{[2
]}

Kaufmann P.M. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Kent State University, Kent

[2] University of New Orleans and Jefferson Neurobehavioral Group, New Orleans

[3] Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

来源：

Psychological Injury and Law | 2010年 / 3卷 / 1期

关键词：

FBS; MMPI-2; Symptom validity;

D O I：

10.1007/s12207-009-9049-0

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

We respond briefly to Williams et al.'s (Psychological Injury and the Law 2:182-197, 2009) most recent effort to critique the MMPI-2 Symptom Validity scale, noting that the authors repeat many of the unfounded claims and conclusions of Butcher et al. (Psychological Injury and the Law 1:191-209, 2008) while ignoring and/or reflecting a misunderstanding of many of the points raised in our rebuttal. Rather than repeat our detailed responses to their initial review, we limit this comment to addressing new points Williams et al. (Psychological Injury and the Law 2:182-197, 2009) bring up and offer a succinct summary of the issues raised in this exchange. © 2009 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.

引用

页码：77 / 80

页数：3

共 24 条

[1]

Armstrong D., Malingerer test roils personal-injury law: "Fake Bad Scale" bars real victims, its critics contend, The Wall Street Journal, (2008)

[2]

Ben-Porath Y.S., Greve K.W., Bianchini K.J., Kaufmann P.M., The MMPI-2 symptom validity scale (FBS) is an empirically-validated measure of over-reporting in personal injury litigants and claimants: Reply to Butcher et al. (2008), Psychological Injury and the Law, 2, 1, pp. 62-85, (2009)

[3]

Bianchini K.J., Houston R.J., Greve K.W., Irvin T.R., Black F.W., Swift D.A., Et al., Malingered neurocognitive dysfunction in neurotoxic exposure: An application of the slick criteria, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45, pp. 1087-1099, (2003)

[4]

Bianchini K.J., Greve K.W., Love J.M., Definite malingered neurocognitive dysfunction in moderate/severe traumatic brain injury, The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, pp. 574-580, (2003)

[5]

Bianchini K.J., Etherton J.L., Greve K.W., Diagnosing cognitive malingering in patients with work-related pain: Four cases, Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 4, pp. 65-85, (2004)

[6]

Bianchini K.J., Greve K.W., Glynn G., On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: Lessons from cognitive malingering research, The Spine Journal, 5, pp. 404-417, (2005)

[7]

Boone K.B., Assessment of Feigned Cognitive Impairment: A Neuropsychological Perspective, (2007)

[8]

Boone K.B., Lu P.H., Noncredible cognitive performance in the context of severe brain injury, The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, pp. 244-254, (2003)

[9]

Butcher J.N., Arbisi P.A., Atlis M.M., McNulty J.L., The construct validity of the Lees-Haley Fake-Bad Scale (FBS): Does this scale measure somatic malingering and feigned emotional distress?, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, pp. 473-485, (2003)

[10]

Butcher J.N., Gass C.S., Cumella E., Kally Z., Williams C.L., Potential bias in MMPI-2 assessments using the Fake Bad Scale (FBS), Psychological Injury and the Law, 1, pp. 191-209, (2008)

← 1 2 3 →