The rise of fragment-based drug discovery

被引:0
作者
Murray C.W. [1 ]
Rees D.C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Astex Therapeutics, 436 Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge CB4 0QA, Milton Road
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nchem.217
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The search for new drugs is plagued by high attrition rates at all stages in research and development. Chemists have an opportunity to tackle this problem because attrition can be traced back, in part, to the quality of the chemical leads. Fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD) is a new approach, increasingly used in the pharmaceutical industry, for reducing attrition and providing leads for previously intractable biological targets. FBDD identifies low-molecular-weight ligands (150 Da) that bind to biologically important macromolecules. The three-dimensional experimental binding mode of these fragments is determined using X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy, and is used to facilitate their optimization into potent molecules with drug-like properties. Compared with high-throughput-screening, the fragment approach requires fewer compounds to be screened, and, despite the lower initial potency of the screening hits, offers more efficient and fruitful optimization campaigns. Here, we review the rise of FBDD, including its application to discovering clinical candidates against targets for which other chemistry approaches have struggled. © 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 192
页数:5
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Fattori D., Molecular recognition: The fragment approach in lead generation, Drug Discov. Today, 9, pp. 229-238, (2004)
  • [2] Congreve M., Chessari G., Tisi D., Woodhead A.J., Recent developments in fragment-based drug discovery, J. Med. Chem, 51, pp. 3661-3680, (2008)
  • [3] Congreve M., Murray C.W., Blundell T.L., Structural biology and drug discovery, Drug Discov. Today, 10, pp. 895-907, (2005)
  • [4] Lipinski C.A., Lombardo F., Dominy B.W., Feeney P.J., Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev, 46, pp. 3-26, (2001)
  • [5] Gleeson M.P., Generation of a set of simple, interpretable ADMET rules of thumb, J. Med. Chem, 51, pp. 817-834, (2008)
  • [6] Leeson P.D., Springthorpe B., Te infuence of drug-like concepts on decision-making in medicinal chemistry, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov, 6, pp. 881-890, (2007)
  • [7] Teague S.J., Davis A.M., Leeson P.D., Oprea T., Te design of leadlike combinatorial libraries, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 38, pp. 3743-3748, (1999)
  • [8] Vieth M., Et al., Characteristic physical properties and structural fragments of marketed oral drugs, J. Med. Chem, 47, pp. 224-232, (2004)
  • [9] Wenlock M.C., Austin R.P., Barton P., Davis A.M., Leeson P.D., A comparison of physiochemical property profles of development and marketed oral drugs, J. Med. Chem, 46, pp. 1250-1256, (2003)
  • [10] Hughes J.D., Et al., Physiochemical drug properties associated with in vivo toxicological outcomes, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett, 18, pp. 4872-4875, (2008)