The Impact of Officer and Agency Characteristics on the Likelihood of Arrest in Domestic Violence Situations among Rural Law Enforcement Officers

被引:2
作者
Lambert E.G. [1 ]
Hogan N.L. [2 ]
Barton S.M. [3 ]
Jiang S. [4 ]
Ventura L. [5 ]
Nerbonne T. [6 ]
机构
[1] Department of Criminal Justice, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606, HH 3225
[2] School of Criminal Justice, Ferris State University, Big Rapids, MI, 49307
[3] Department of Criminology, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN, 47809
[4] Department of Criminal Justice, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606, HH 3016
[5] Department of Criminal Justice, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606, HHS 3004
[6] School of Criminal Justice, Ferris State University, Big Rapids, MI, 49307
关键词
Arrest decision-making; Domestic violence; Law enforcement; Rural areas;
D O I
10.1007/s11896-007-9011-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Domestic violence cuts across all demographic groups. The factors related to why police officers arrest in some domestic violence situations but not others have been often studied. Little research, however, has been conducted on the arrest views of rural police officers. One hundred seventy line officers in six rural Midwestern counties were surveyed to determine the impact of officer personal characteristics and agency type on arrest decisions in various hypothetical domestic violence scenarios. First, the same situational factors appeared to be important in shaping the arrest decision in domestic violence calls of rural officers as have previously been found with urban officers. Second, the characteristics of officers and the type of agency had some impact on the likelihood of arrest, particularly if there was evidence of a physical assault. Third, the presence of evidence of a physical assault helped shape the arrest decisions of rural officers. Fourth, situational factors were more important than officer characteristics and the type of agency. © 2007 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 101
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Avakame E., Fyfe J., Differential police treatment of male-on-female spousal violence: Additional evidence on the leniency thesis, Violence Against Women, 7, pp. 22-45, (2001)
[2]  
Bass J., Rural policing: Patterns and problems of "micro" departments, Justice Prof, 9, pp. 59-74, (1995)
[3]  
Belknap J., Law enforcement officers' attitudes about the appropriate response to woman battering, Int Rev Vict, 4, pp. 47-62, (1995)
[4]  
Bourg S., Stock H., A review of domestic violence arrest statistics in a police department using a pro-arrest policy: Are pro-arrest policies enough, J Fam Violence, 9, pp. 177-189, (1994)
[5]  
Breci M., Simons R., An examination of organizational and individual factors that influence police response to domestic disturbances, J Police Sci Adm, 15, pp. 93-104, (1987)
[6]  
Cramer E., Variables that predict verdicts in domestic violence cases, J Interpers Violence, 14, pp. 1137-1150, (1999)
[7]  
EDK Opinion Survey of Public Attitudes Toward Domestic Violence, (1992)
[8]  
Felder L., Domestic violence and police response in a pro-arrest jurisdiction, Women Crim Justice, 8, 4, pp. 79-98, (1997)
[9]  
Finn M., Stalans L., Police referrals to shelters and mental health treatment: Examining their decisions in domestic assault cases, Crime Delinq, 41, pp. 467-480, (1995)
[10]  
Finn M., Blackwell B., Stalans L., Studdard S., Dugan L., Dual arrest decisions in domestic violence cases: The influence of department policies, Crime Delinq, 50, pp. 565-589, (2004)