Nano-Evaluris: an inhalation and explosion risk evaluation method for nanoparticle use. Part I: description of the methodology

被引:0
作者
Jacques X. Bouillard
Alexis Vignes
机构
[1] INERIS,
[2] Parc Alata,undefined
来源
Journal of Nanoparticle Research | 2014年 / 16卷
关键词
Nanosafety; “Nanosafety by design”; Nanotoxicity; Nanoparticles; Risk evaluation; Control banding; Accidental and chronic risk; Safety barriers; Collective and individual protections; Seveso major accident risks;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, an inhalation health and explosion safety risk assessment methodology for nanopowders is described. Since toxicological threshold limit values are still unknown for nanosized substances, detailed risk assessment on specific plants may not be carried out. A simple approach based on occupational hazard/exposure band expressed in mass concentrations is proposed for nanopowders. This approach is consolidated with an iso surface toxicological scaling method, which has the merit, although incomplete, to provide concentration threshold levels for which new metrological instruments should be developed for proper air monitoring in order to ensure safety. Whenever the processing or use of nanomaterials is introducing a risk to the worker, a specific nano pictogram is proposed to inform the worker. Examples of risk assessment of process equipment (i.e., containment valves) processing various nanomaterials are provided. Explosion risks related to very reactive nanomaterials such as aluminum nanopowders can be assessed using this new analysis methodology adapted to nanopowders. It is nevertheless found that to formalize and extend this approach, it is absolutely necessary to develop new relevant standard apparatuses and to qualify individual and collective safety barriers with respect to health and explosion risks. In spite of these uncertainties, it appears, as shown in the second paper (Part II) that health and explosion risks, evaluated for given MWCNTs and aluminum nanoparticles, remain manageable in their continuous fabrication mode, considering current individual and collective safety barriers that can be put in place. The authors would, however, underline that peculiar attention must be paid to non-continuous modes of operations, such as process equipment cleaning steps, that are often under-analyzed and are too often forgotten critical steps needing vigilance in order to minimize potential toxic and explosion risks.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 145 条
  • [1] Baran E(2002)In vivo half life of nanoencapsulated J Mater Sci Mater Med 13 1113-1121
  • [2] Özer N(1986)-asparaginase J Hazard Mater 13 301-309
  • [3] Hasirci V(2010)Concentration time mortality response relationship of irritant systemic acting vapours and gases J Hazard Mater 181 873-880
  • [4] Berge TWF(2012)Ignition and explosion risks of nanopowders Ann Occup Hyg 56 506-514
  • [5] Zwaert A(2003)Control banding approaches for nanomaterials Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9 973-985
  • [6] Appelman LM(2002)Haber’s rule: the search for quantitative relationships in toxicology J Mater Sci Mater Med 13 523-526
  • [7] Bouillard J(2001)Gelatin nanoparticles produced by a simple W/O emulsion as delivery system for methotrexate J Loss Prev Process Ind 14 475-487
  • [8] Vignes A(2006)On the transient flow in the 20-liter explosion sphere J Hazard Mater 130 220-233
  • [9] Dufaud O(2006)ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance J Hazard Mater 130 200-219
  • [10] Perrin L(2008)ARAMIS project: a comprehensive methodology for the identification of reference accident scenarios in process industries Part Fibre Toxicol 5 20-171