A fludarabine, thiotepa reduced toxicity conditioning regimen designed specifically for allogeneic second haematopoietic cell transplantation after failure of previous autologous or allogeneic transplantation

被引:0
作者
C Grüllich
H Bertz
A Spyridonidis
C I Müller
J Finke
机构
[1] Albert Ludwigs-University Medical Center Freiburg,Department of Haematology and Oncology
[2] 2Current address: Patras University Medical School,undefined
[3] Department of International Medicine,undefined
[4] Haematology Division,undefined
[5] Rion/Patras 26500,undefined
[6] Greece.,undefined
来源
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2008年 / 41卷
关键词
allogeneic second HCT; failed HCT; fludarabine; thiotepa; alemtuzumab;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We present a phase II study of fludarabine 5 × 30 mg/m2, thiotepa 3 × 5 mg/kg as preparative regimen specifically for allogeneic second haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) after failure of previous HCT. Forty-nine patients (median age 52 years, range 27–68) received an allogeneic second HCT after failed autologous (n=29) or allogeneic (n=20) HCT. Diagnoses were AML (n=18), ALL (n=3), multiple myeloma (n=11), lymphoma (n=16) and CML (n=1). GVHD prophylaxis consisted of CYA and mainly low dose alemtuzumab (40 mg). The median follow-up for patients alive is 528 days (range 217–1344). In 43 of 49 (88%) evaluable patients response rates were CR=19, PR=14 and SD=10 at one month. At one year, the probability (95% confidence interval) of relapse is 55.1 (38.2–72)% and the nonrelapse mortality (NRM) is 29 (14.2–44.4)%. Estimated survival at one year is 42.6 (28.7–56.6)% and event free survival is 38.1 (24.4–51.8)%. Survival was significantly better for patients experiencing relapse beyond one year, than for patients relapsing within one year from first transplantation (51.2 (33.5–68.9)% vs 27 (7–48.5)%; P=0.013). We conclude that this regimen is feasible and well tolerated for allogeneic second HCT.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 850
页数:5
相关论文
共 172 条
[1]  
Eapen M(2004)Second transplant for acute and chronic leukemia relapsing after first HLA-identical sibling transplant Bone Marrow Transplant 34 721-727
[2]  
Giralt SA(2003)Allografting after nonmyeloablative conditioning as a treatment after a failed conventional hematopoietic cell transplant Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 9 266-272
[3]  
Horowitz MM(2005)Effect of age and previous autologous transplantation on nonrelapse mortality and survival in patients treated with reduced-intensity conditioning and allografting for advanced hematologic malignancies J Clin Oncol 23 6690-6698
[4]  
Klein JP(1997)Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in patients who relapse after autologous transplantation Bone Marrow Transplant 20 859-863
[5]  
Wagner JE(2000)The dismal outcome in patients with acute leukaemia who relapse after an autograft is improved if a second autograft or a matched allograft is performed. Acute Leukaemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Bone Marrow Transplant 25 1053-1058
[6]  
Zhang MJ(1993)Second allogeneic marrow transplantation for patients with recurrent leukemia after initial transplant with total-body irradiation-containing regimens J Clin Oncol 11 304-313
[7]  
Feinstein LC(1982)Allogeneic marrow transplantation for patients with acute non-lymphoblastic leukemia in second remission Leuk Res 6 395-399
[8]  
Sandmaier BM(2002)Treatment of leukemia by alloreactive lymphocytes and nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation J Clin Immunol 22 64-69
[9]  
Maloney DG(2003)Non-myeloablative allografting from human leucocyte antigen-identical sibling donors for treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission Br J Haematol 120 281-288
[10]  
Maris MB(2001)Reduced intensity conditioning: enhanced graft-versus-tumor effect following dose-reduced conditioning and allogeneic transplantation for refractory lymphoid malignancies after high-dose therapy Bone Marrow Transplant 28 335-339