Effects of self-assessment feedback on self-assessment and task-selection accuracy

被引:0
作者
Steven F. Raaijmakers
Martine Baars
Fred Paas
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer
Tamara van Gog
机构
[1] Utrecht University,Department of Education
[2] Erasmus University Rotterdam,Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies
[3] University of Wollongong,School of Psychology
[4] Maastricht University,School of Health Professions Education
来源
Metacognition and Learning | 2019年 / 14卷
关键词
Self-regulated learning; Problem solving; Self-assessment; Task-selection; Feedback;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Effective self-regulated learning in settings in which students can decide what tasks to work on, requires accurate self-assessment (i.e., a judgment of own level of performance) as well as accurate task selection (i.e., choosing a subsequent task that fits the current level of performance). Because self-assessment accuracy is often low, task-selection accuracy suffers as well and, consequently, self-regulated learning can lead to suboptimal learning outcomes. Recent studies have shown that a training with video modeling examples enhanced self-assessment accuracy on problem-solving tasks, but the training was not equally effective for every student and, overall, there was room for further improvement in self-assessment accuracy. Therefore, we investigated whether training with video examples followed by feedback focused on self-assessment accuracy would improve subsequent self-assessment and task-selection accuracy in the absence of the feedback. Experiment 1 showed, contrary to our hypothesis, that self-assessment feedback led to less accurate future self-assessments. In Experiment 2, we provided students with feedback focused on self-assessment accuracy plus information on the correct answers, or feedback focused on self-assessment accuracy, plus the correct answers and the opportunity to contrast those with their own answers. Again, however, we found no beneficial effect of feedback on subsequent self-assessment accuracy. In sum, we found no evidence that feedback on self-assessment accuracy improves subsequent accuracy. Therefore, future research should address other ways improving accuracy, for instance by taking into account the cues upon which students base their self-assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 42
页数:21
相关论文
共 107 条
[21]  
Yen CJ(2015)If it is stored in my memory I will surely retrieve it: Anatomy of a metacognitive belief Metacognition and Learning 10 279-292
[22]  
Corbalan G(2012)Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning Learning and Instruction 22 121-132
[23]  
Kester L(1999)Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 1121-1134
[24]  
Van Merriënboer JJ(2009)Using standards to improve middle school students’ accuracy at evaluating the quality of their recall Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 15 307-318
[25]  
Corbalan G(2011)Training metacognition in the classroom: The influence of incentives and feedback on exam predictions Metacognition and Learning 6 303-314
[26]  
Kester L(2006)The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy Metacognition and Learning 1 159-179
[27]  
van Merriënboer JJG(1992)Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach Journal of Educational Psychology 84 429-434
[28]  
De Bruin ABH(2017)A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research Frontiers in Psychology 8 803-830
[29]  
Van Gog T(2015)The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions Educational Psychology Review 28 74-98
[30]  
De Bruin AB(2017)Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses Educational Research Review 22 559-579