Effects of self-assessment feedback on self-assessment and task-selection accuracy

被引:0
作者
Steven F. Raaijmakers
Martine Baars
Fred Paas
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer
Tamara van Gog
机构
[1] Utrecht University,Department of Education
[2] Erasmus University Rotterdam,Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies
[3] University of Wollongong,School of Psychology
[4] Maastricht University,School of Health Professions Education
来源
Metacognition and Learning | 2019年 / 14卷
关键词
Self-regulated learning; Problem solving; Self-assessment; Task-selection; Feedback;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Effective self-regulated learning in settings in which students can decide what tasks to work on, requires accurate self-assessment (i.e., a judgment of own level of performance) as well as accurate task selection (i.e., choosing a subsequent task that fits the current level of performance). Because self-assessment accuracy is often low, task-selection accuracy suffers as well and, consequently, self-regulated learning can lead to suboptimal learning outcomes. Recent studies have shown that a training with video modeling examples enhanced self-assessment accuracy on problem-solving tasks, but the training was not equally effective for every student and, overall, there was room for further improvement in self-assessment accuracy. Therefore, we investigated whether training with video examples followed by feedback focused on self-assessment accuracy would improve subsequent self-assessment and task-selection accuracy in the absence of the feedback. Experiment 1 showed, contrary to our hypothesis, that self-assessment feedback led to less accurate future self-assessments. In Experiment 2, we provided students with feedback focused on self-assessment accuracy plus information on the correct answers, or feedback focused on self-assessment accuracy, plus the correct answers and the opportunity to contrast those with their own answers. Again, however, we found no beneficial effect of feedback on subsequent self-assessment accuracy. In sum, we found no evidence that feedback on self-assessment accuracy improves subsequent accuracy. Therefore, future research should address other ways improving accuracy, for instance by taking into account the cues upon which students base their self-assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 42
页数:21
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Azevedo R(2009)Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion Metacognition and Learning 4 87-95
[2]  
Azevedo R(2004)Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology 96 523-535
[3]  
Cromley JG(2014)Effects of training self-assessment and using assessment standards on retrospective and prospective monitoring of problem solving Learning and Instruction 33 92-107
[4]  
Baars M(2010)How accurately can older adults evaluate the quality of their text recall? The effect of providing standards on judgment accuracy Applied Cognitive Psychology 24 134-147
[5]  
Vink S(2004)The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis Review of Educational Research 74 29-58
[6]  
Van Gog T(2013)Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions Annual Review of Psychology 64 417-444
[7]  
De Bruin A(2016)The effects of self-regulated learning training on community college students’ metacognition and achievement in developmental math courses Community College Journal of Research and Practice 40 480-495
[8]  
Paas F(2008)Selecting learning tasks: Effects of adaptation and shared control on learning efficiency and task involvement Contemporary Educational Psychology 33 733-756
[9]  
Baker JMC(2009)Dynamic task selection: Effects of feedback and learner control on efficiency and motivation Learning and Instruction 19 455-465
[10]  
Dunlosky J(2012)Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom Learning and Instruction 22 245-252