Portfolio choice in the model of expected utility with a safety-first component

被引:0
作者
Dennis W. Jansen
Liqun Liu
机构
[1] Texas A&M University,Department of Economics and Private Enterprise Research Center
[2] Texas A&M University,Private Enterprise Research Center
来源
Decisions in Economics and Finance | 2022年 / 45卷
关键词
Portfolio choice; Expected utility; Safety first; Risk aversion; D81; G11;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The standard problem of portfolio choice between one risky and one riskless asset is analyzed in the model of expected utility with a safety-first component that is represented by the probability of final wealth exceeding a “safety” wealth level. It finds that a positive expected excess return remains sufficient for investing a positive amount in the risky asset except in the special situation where the safety wealth level coincides with the wealth obtained when the entire initial wealth is invested in the riskless asset. In this situation, the optimal amount invested in the risky asset is zero if the weight on the safety-first component is sufficiently large. Comparative statics analysis reveals that whether the optimal amount invested in the risky asset becomes smaller as the weight on the safety-first component increases depends on whether the safety wealth level is below the wealth obtained when the entire initial wealth is invested in the riskless asset. Further comparative statics analyses with respect to the safety wealth level and the degree of risk aversion in the expected utility component are also conducted.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 207
页数:20
相关论文
共 106 条
  • [1] Arzac ER(1977)Portfolio choice and equilibrium in capital markets with safety-first investors J. Financ. Econ. 4 277-288
  • [2] Bawa VS(2020)Searching for the reference point Manag. Sci. 66 93-112
  • [3] Baillon A(1978)Safety-first, stochastic dominance, and optimal portfolio choice J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 13 255-271
  • [4] Bleichrodt H(2015)Rationalizing investors’ choices J. Math. Econ. 59 10-23
  • [5] Spinu V(2010)Static portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory Math. Financ. Econ. 2 277-306
  • [6] Bawa VS(2012)Comparative risk aversion: a formal approach with applications to saving behavior J. Econ. Theory 147 1614-1641
  • [7] Bernard C(2014)Too risk averse to purchase insurance? J. Risk Uncertain. 48 135-166
  • [8] Chen JS(2019)Risk aversion and precautionary savings in dynamic settings Manag. Sci. 65 1386-1397
  • [9] Vanduffel S(2017)Risk taking after absolute and relative wealth changes: the role of reference point adaptation J. Risk Uncertain. 54 157-186
  • [10] Bernard C(2005)More pessimism than greediness: a characterization of monotone risk aversion in the rank-dependent expected utility model Econ. Theor. 25 649-667