Positive and Negative Leadership in Late Childhood: Similarities in Individual but Differences in Interpersonal Characteristics

被引:0
作者
Zhe Dong
Gijs Huitsing
René Veenstra
机构
[1] Department of Sociology,
[2] University of Groningen,undefined
来源
Journal of Youth and Adolescence | 2023年 / 52卷
关键词
leadership; popularity; bullying; defending; children; heterogeneity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Previous research has shown that leadership is associated not only with positive but also with negative characteristics and behaviors; knowledge of the similarities and differences between positive and negative leaders remains insufficient. This study aimed to examine (1) the existence of different subtypes of leaders and (2) to what extent these leaders differed on individual and interpersonal characteristics. The sample contained 9213 students in grades 3–6 (Dutch grades 5–8), from 392 classrooms in 98 schools (50.3% girls, Mage = 10.13 ± 1.23 years). Latent profile analysis identified three leader profiles and four non-leader profiles based on peer nominations received for leadership, popularity, and positive (defending) and negative (bullying) behavior: (1) positive leaders, (2) negative leaders, (3) non-popular leaders, (4) popular children, (5) bullies, (6) extreme bullies, and (7) modal children. Multinomial logistic regression showed similarities and differences between positive and negative leaders, as well as between each of these and the other five profiles. Positive leaders were more accepted and less rejected and had more friendships than negative leaders, but the differences in individual characteristics (self-esteem, self-control, and social goals) were less clear. This study demonstrated that 10–15% of the children were perceived as leaders, and that positive leadership became more prevalent in the higher grades. Nevertheless, negative leadership occurred also in the higher grades. Interventions aimed at turning negative leaders into positive leaders may work, because positive and negative leaders do not differ greatly in individual characteristics. Such interventions may improve the relationships of negative leaders with their classmates, which may be good for their likeability (but not at the expense of their popularity) as well as for the social atmosphere in the class as a whole.
引用
收藏
页码:1620 / 1631
页数:11
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [1] Andrews NC(2020)Prestigious youth are leaders but central youth are powerful: What social network position tells us about peer relationships Journal of Youth and Adolescence 49 631-644
  • [2] Cillessen AH(2014)Aggressive effects of prioritizing popularity in early adolescence Aggressive Behavior 40 204-213
  • [3] Mayeux L(2008)What makes a leader? Relative age and high school leadership Economics of Education Review 27 173-183
  • [4] Ha T(2008)Beyond the class norm: bullying behavior of popular adolescents and its relation to peer acceptance and rejection Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 36 1289-1299
  • [5] de Bruyn EH(2016)The meaningful roles intervention: an evolutionary approach to reducing bullying and increasing prosocial behavior Journal of Research on Adolescence 26 622-637
  • [6] LaFontana KM(2021)Leader development for adolescent girls: state of the field and a framework for moving forward The Leadership Quarterly 32 101457-1004
  • [7] Dhuey E(2003)Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural african american early adolescents Developmental Psychology 39 992-879
  • [8] Lipscomb S(2015)Emotional labor actors: a latent profile analysis of emotional labor strategies Journal of Applied Psychology 100 863-132
  • [9] Dijkstra JK(2017)Self‐control in childhood: a synthesis of perspectives and focus on early development Child Development Perspectives 11 127-132
  • [10] Lindenberg S(1999)The ontogenesis of social dominance: a strategy-based evolutionary perspective Developmental Review 19 97-309