Quantifying the mover’s advantage: transatlantic migration, employment prestige, and scientific performance

被引:0
作者
Benjamin C. Holding
Claudia Acciai
Jesper W. Schneider
Mathias W. Nielsen
机构
[1] University of Copenhagen,Department of Sociology
[2] Aarhus University,Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Department of Political Science
来源
Higher Education | 2024年 / 87卷
关键词
Researcher mobility; Employment prestige; Performance; Science;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research on scientific careers finds a mover’s advantage. International migration correlates with increased visibility and productivity. However, if scientists who move internationally, on average, enter into more prestigious employments than they came from, extant research may overestimate the direct performance gains associated with international moves. Building on insights from the sociology of science and studies of international researcher mobility, we examine how changes in employment prestige shape international movers’ performance returns to mobility. We follow a cohort of 167,014 European scientists to identify individuals that move to the USA and pair these migrants to non-mobile scientists with identical home institutions, research fields, and genders, giving a final sample of 3978 researchers. Using a difference-in-differences design, we show a substantial increase in the publishing rates and scientific impact of transatlantic migrants, compared to non-mobile scientists. However, most of the movers’ mobility-related boost in citation and journal impact is attributable to changes in employment prestige. In contrast, we find limited effects of employment prestige on changes in migrants’ publication rates. Overall, our study suggests large variations in the outcomes of transatlantic migration and reaffirms the citation-related “visibility advantage” tied to prestigious institutional locations.
引用
收藏
页码:1749 / 1767
页数:18
相关论文
共 121 条
  • [1] Abramo G(2017)The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants Journal of Informetrics 11 1016-1030
  • [2] D’Angelo AC(2008)Internalisation, mobility and metrics: A new form of indirect discrimination? Minerva 46 411-435
  • [3] Murgia G(2013)Are mobile researchers more productive and cited than non-mobile researchers? A large-scale study of norwegian scientists Research Evaluation 22 215-223
  • [4] Ackers L(1990)Departmental effects on scientific productivity American Sociological Review 55 469-478
  • [5] Aksnes DW(2017)The mobility of elite life scientists: Professional and personal determinants Research Policy 46 573-590
  • [6] Rørstad, Kristoffer, Piro, Fredrik N(2004)The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks American Sociological Review 69 239-264
  • [7] Sivertsen G(2020)Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods Journal of Econometrics 225 1-31
  • [8] Allison PD(2008)Measuring and assessing researcher mobility from CV analysis: The case of the Ramón y Cajal programme in Spain Research Evaluation 17 17-31
  • [9] Long JS(2015)Systematic inequalities and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks Science Advances 1 e1400005-201
  • [10] Azoulay P(1967)The gatekeepers of Science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals American Sociological Review 2 195-964