Onset detection in surface electromyographic signals: A systematic comparison of methods

被引:136
作者
Staude G. [1 ]
Flachenecker C. [1 ]
Daumer M. [1 ]
Wolf W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst. f. Math. und Datenverarbeitung, Universitat der Bundeswehr Munchen, München
关键词
Comparison; Electromyography; EMG; Onset detection method; Performance;
D O I
10.1155/S1110865701000191
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Various methods to determine the onset of the electromyographic activity which occurs in response to a stimulus have been discussed in the literature over the last decade. Due to the stochastic characteristic of the surface electromyogram (SEMG), onset detection is a challenging task, especially in weak SEMG responses. The performance of the onset detection methods were tested, mostly by comparing their automated onset estimations to the manually determined onsets found by well-trained SEMG examiners. But a systematic comparison between methods, which reveals the benefits and the drawbacks of each method compared to the other ones and shows the specific dependence of the detection accuracy on signal parameters, is still lacking. In this paper, several classical threshold-based approaches as well as some statistically optimized algorithms were tested on large samples of simulated SEMG data with well-known signal parameters. Rating between methods is performed by comparing their performance to that of a statistically optimal maximum likelihood estimator which serves as reference method. In addition, performance was evaluated on real SEMG data obtained in a reaction time experiment. Results indicate that detection behavior strongly depends on SEMG parameters, such as onset rise time, signal-to-noise ratio or background activity level. It is shown that some of the threshold-based signal-power-estimation procedures are very sensitive to signal parameters, whereas statistically optimized algorithms are generally more robust.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 81
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]  
Van Boxtel G.J.M., Geerats L.H.D., Van den Berg-Lenssen M.M.C., Brunia C.H.M., Detection of EMG onset in ERP research, Psychophysiology, 30, pp. 405-412, (1993)
[12]  
Staude G., Wolf W., Objective motor response onset detection in surface myoelectric signals, Med. Eng. Phys., 21, pp. 449-467, (1999)
[13]  
Hodges P.W., Bui B.H., A comparison of computer-based methods for determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 101, pp. 511-519, (1996)
[14]  
Bonato P., D'Alessio T., Knaflitz M., A statistical method for the measurement of muscle activation intervals from surface myoelectric signal during gait, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 45, pp. 287-298, (1998)
[15]  
Lidierth M., A computer based method for automated measurement of the periods of muscular activity from an EMG and its application to locomotor EMGs, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 64, pp. 378-380, (1986)
[16]  
Staude G., Dengler R., Wolf W., The discontinuous nature of motor execution part I: A model concept for single-muscle multiple-task coordination, Biol. Cybern., 82, pp. 23-33, (2000)
[17]  
Ljung L., System Identification: Theory for the User, (1987)
[18]  
Barrett G., Shibasaki H., Neshige R., A computer-assisted method for averaging movement-related cortical potentials with respect to EMG onset, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 60, pp. 276-281, (1985)
[19]  
Choi H.G., Principe J.C., Hutchison A.A., Wozniak J.A., Multiresolution segmentation of respiratory electromyographic signals, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 41, pp. 257-266, (1994)
[20]  
Staude G., Wolf W., Appel U., Automatic event detection in surface EMG of rhythmically activated muscles, An Int. Conf. IEEE BME Soc., 17, pp. 1351-1352, (1995)