Convergence, divergence, and macroevolutionary constraint as revealed by anatomical network analysis of the squamate skull, with an emphasis on snakes

被引:0
作者
Catherine R. C. Strong
Mark D. Scherz
Michael W. Caldwell
机构
[1] University of Alberta,Department of Biological Sciences
[2] University of Copenhagen,Natural History Museum of Denmark
[3] University of Alberta,Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
[4] Harvard University,Museum of Comparative Zoology and Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology
来源
Scientific Reports | / 12卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Traditionally considered the earliest-diverging group of snakes, scolecophidians are central to major evolutionary paradigms regarding squamate feeding mechanisms and the ecological origins of snakes. However, quantitative analyses of these phenomena remain scarce. Herein, we therefore assess skull modularity in squamates via anatomical network analysis, focusing on the interplay between ‘microstomy’ (small-gaped feeding), fossoriality, and miniaturization in scolecophidians. Our analyses reveal distinctive patterns of jaw connectivity across purported ‘microstomatans’, thus supporting a more complex scenario of jaw evolution than traditionally portrayed. We also find that fossoriality and miniaturization each define a similar region of topospace (i.e., connectivity-based morphospace), with their combined influence imposing further evolutionary constraint on skull architecture. These results ultimately indicate convergence among scolecophidians, refuting widespread perspectives of these snakes as fundamentally plesiomorphic and morphologically homogeneous. This network-based examination of skull modularity—the first of its kind for snakes, and one of the first to analyze squamates—thus provides key insights into macroevolutionary trends among squamates, with particular implications for snake origins and evolution.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 268 条
  • [1] Mahendra BC(1936)Contributions to the osteology of the Ophidia. I. The endoskeleton of the so-called 'blind-snake', Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 3 128-142
  • [2] Mahendra BC(1938) Daud Anat. Anz. 86 347-356
  • [3] Bellairs AD(1951)Some remarks on the phylogeny of the Ophidia Biol. Rev. 26 193-237
  • [4] Underwood G(1966)The origin of snakes Biol. Monogr. 36 1-112
  • [5] List JC(2018)Comparative osteology of the snake families Typhlopidae and Leptotyphlopidae. Ill J. Evol. Biol. 31 1782-1793
  • [6] Miralles A(2012)Molecular evidence for the paraphyly of Scolecophidia and its evolutionary implications Biol. Lett. 8 1043-1046
  • [7] Wiens JJ(1950)Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species Evolution 4 79-86
  • [8] Schmidt KP(1999)Modes of evolution discernible in the taxonomy of snakes Nature 402 369-370
  • [9] Kley NJ(2002)Feeding by mandibular raking in a snake Biol. Rev. 77 333-401
  • [10] Brainerd EL(2015)Snake phylogeny based on osteology, soft anatomy and ecology BMC Evol. Biol. 15 87-108