Mass retraction movement of the anterior upper teeth using orthodontic mini-implants as anchorage

被引:5
作者
Leonardo Henrique de Lima Araújo
Elton Gonçalves Zenóbio
Wellington Pacheco
Maurício Greco Cosso
Flávio Ricardo Manzi
Jamil Awad Shibli
机构
[1] Pontifical Catholic University (PUC) Minas, Belo Horizonte, MG
[2] Department of Implant Dentistry, Pontifical Catholic University (PUC) Minas, Belo Horizonte, MG
[3] Department of Periodontology, University of Guarulhos, Guarulhos, SP
关键词
Anchorage; Orthodontic mini-implants; Orthodontics;
D O I
10.1007/s10006-011-0260-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Several studies have demonstrated the application of mini-implants in the orthodontic treatment as anchorage during the retraction movement of the anterior teeth. Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the mass retraction movement of the anterior upper teeth using orthodontic mini-implants as anchorage. Materials and methods: Nine patients with class I malocclusion and Angle's class II, needing extractions of the upper first premolars, were enrolled in this case series. The retraction was performed using sliding mechanics and orthodontic anchorage on mini-implants. Measures were taken by initial and final cephalometric X-rays of the retraction movement to evaluate whether the mini-implants remained stationary and displacements of the incisors and the upper first premolars. Results: Out of 18 mini-implants, 8 mesialized (0. 45 mm, average) and 3 extruded (0. 14 mm, average). The upper incisors were retracted on the average of 4. 21 mm, extruded 0. 33 mm, and tipped 10. 3°. There were no statistical significant modifications in the placement of the posterior teeth. Conclusions: Although there was a very small displacement of the mini-implants, they still provided an adequate anchorage for the retraction of the anterior teeth, and there was no loss in the anchorage of the posterior teeth. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 99
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Park H.S., Et al., Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion, J Clin Orthod, 35, pp. 417-422, (2001)
  • [2] Kyung H.M., Et al., Development of orthodontic micro-implants for intraoral anchorage, J Clin Orthod, 37, (2003)
  • [3] Kanoni R., Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage, J Clin Orthod, 31, 11, pp. 763-767, (1997)
  • [4] Park Y.C., Esthetic segmental retraction of maxillary anterior teeth with a palatal appliance and orthodontic mini-implants, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131, pp. 537-544, (2007)
  • [5] Melsen B., Mini-implants: where are we?, J Clin Orthod, 39, pp. 539-547, (2005)
  • [6] Thiruvenkatachari B., Et al., Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp. 551-554, (2006)
  • [7] Park H.S., Kwon T.G., Sliding mechanics with microscrew implant anchorage, Angle Orthod, 74, pp. 703-710, (2004)
  • [8] Chung K.R., Et al., Severe bidentoalveolar protrusion treated with orthodontic microimplant-dependent en-masse retraction, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp. 105-115, (2007)
  • [9] Samuels R.H.A., Et al., A clinical study of space closure with nickel-titanium closed coil springs and an elastic module, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114, pp. 73-79, (1998)
  • [10] Manhartsberger C., Seidenbusch W., Force delivery of Ni-Ti coil springs, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 109, pp. 8-21, (1996)