Evidence for long-term diffuse deformation of the lithosphere of the equatorial Indian Ocean

被引:1
作者
Richard G. Gordon
Charles DeMets
Jean-Yves Royer
机构
[1] Department of Geology & Geophysics Rice University,
[2] Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Wisconsin,undefined
[3] Géosciences Azur,undefined
[4] CNRS UMR 6526,undefined
[5] BP48,undefined
来源
Nature | 1998年 / 395卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The presence of large earthquakes, east–west-striking folds and thrust faults in sediments, and east–west-striking undulations of wavelength 200 km in topography and gravity shows that the equatorial Indian Ocean is the locus of unusual deformation1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. This deformation has been interpreted as a diffuse boundary between two tectonic plates9,10,11,12,13. Seismic stratigraphy and deep-sea drilling at two locations in the Bengal fan indicate that the deformation began 7.5–8.0 Myr ago3,14,15. Here, however, we show, using plate reconructions, that motion across this diffuse oceanic plate boundary began more than 10 Myr earlier than previously inferred and that the amount of north–south convergence across the boundary through the central Indian basin has been significantly greater than the convergence estimated from seismic profiles. The relative plate velocity accommodated across the central Indian basin has varied with time and has been as fast as ∼6 mm yr−1 — about half the separation rate of Earth's slowest-spreading mid-ocean ridge. The earliest interval of measurable motion, which began more than 18 Myr ago, may coincide with rapid denudation of the Tibetan plateau from ∼21 Myr to 15–17 Myr ( ref. 16). The present motion across the central Indian basin began no earlier than 11 Myr — following an earlier interval of slower motion from 18 to 11 Myr — and may have begun at ∼8 Myr, when the Tibetan plateau is thought to have attained its maximum elevation16,17.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 374
页数:4
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Stein S(1978)Seismicity and tectonics of the Ninetyeast Ridge area: Evidence for internal deformation of the Indian plate. J. Geophys. Res. 83 2233- 2245
[2]  
Okal EA(1980)Deformation of the Indo-Australian plate. Nature 287 284-291
[3]  
Weissel JK(1989)Timing of intraplate deformation, northeastern Indian Ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 94 71-77
[4]  
Anderson RN(1992)Seismic reflection images of intraplate deformation, Central Indian Ocean, and their tectonic significance. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 149 955- 966
[5]  
Geller CA(1993)Intraplate shortening in the central Indian Ocean determined from a 2100-km-long north-south deep seismic reflection profile. Geology 21 1043-1046
[6]  
Curray JR(1995)Distribution of shortening between the Indian and Australian plates in the central Indian Ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 133 35-46
[7]  
Munasinghe T(1985)Folding of oceanic lithosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 90 8563- 8569
[8]  
Bull JM(1985)Adiffuse plate boundary model for Indian Ocean tectonics. Geophys. Res. Lett. 12 429-432
[9]  
Scrutton RA(1990)Kinematic constraints on distributed lithospheric deformation in the equatorial Indian Ocean from present motion between the Australian and Indian plates. Tectonics 9 409- 422
[10]  
Chamot-Rooke N(1991)Evidence for relative motions between the Indian and Australian plates during the last 20 Myr from plate tectonic reconstructions: Implications for the deformation of the Indo-Australian plate. J. Geophys. Res. 96 11779- 11802