What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology

被引：0

作者：

Thomas Beyer

Luc Bidaut

John Dickson

Marc Kachelriess

Fabian Kiessling

Rainer Leitgeb

Jingfei Ma

Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar

Benjamin Theek

Osama Mawlawi

机构：

[1] Medical University Vienna,QIMP Team, Centre for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering

[2] University of Lincoln,College of Science

[3] University College London Hospital,Institute of Nuclear Medicine

[4] German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ),Division of X

[5] RWTH Aachen University,ray imaging and CT

[6] Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS,Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, University Clinic and Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering

[7] Medical University Vienna,Centre for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering

[8] The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Department of Imaging Physics

来源：

Cancer Imaging | / 20卷

关键词：

Oncology imaging; Instrumentation; CT; MRI; Optical; SPECT; US; Sonography; Hybrid imaging; Machine learning;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Oncological diseases account for a significant portion of the burden on public healthcare systems with associated costs driven primarily by complex and long-lasting therapies. Through the visualization of patient-specific morphology and functional-molecular pathways, cancerous tissue can be detected and characterized non-invasively, so as to provide referring oncologists with essential information to support therapy management decisions. Following the onset of stand-alone anatomical and functional imaging, we witness a push towards integrating molecular image information through various methods, including anato-metabolic imaging (e.g., PET/CT), advanced MRI, optical or ultrasound imaging.

引用

共 50 条

[1] What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology
Beyer, Thomas
Bidaut, Luc
Dickson, John
Kachelriess, Marc
Kiessling, Fabian
Leitgeb, Rainer
Ma, Jingfei
Shiyam Sundar, Lalith Kumar
Theek, Benjamin
Mawlawi, Osama
CANCER IMAGING, 2020, 20 (01)
[2] Advances in clinical molecular imaging instrumentation
Hutton, Brian F.
Erlandsson, Kjell
Thielemans, Kris
CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL IMAGING, 2018, 6 (01) : 31 - 45
[3] Advances in clinical molecular imaging instrumentation
Brian F. Hutton
Kjell Erlandsson
Kris Thielemans
Clinical and Translational Imaging, 2018, 6 : 31 - 45
[4] Are we at a crossroads or a plateau? Radiomics and machine learning in abdominal oncology imaging
Summers, Ronald M.
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (06) : 1985 - 1989
[5] Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials
Kurland, Brenda F.
Gerstner, Elizabeth R.
Mountz, James M.
Schwartz, Lawrence H.
Ryan, Christopher W.
Graham, Michael M.
Buatti, John M.
Fennessy, Fiona M.
Eikman, Edward A.
Kumar, Virendra
Forster, Kenneth M.
Wahl, Richard L.
Lieberman, Frank S.
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 30 (09) : 1301 - 1312
[6] What Can We Learn About Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma from Imaging?
Rosenthal, Michael
Schawkat, Khoschy
Muftah, Mayssan
Jajoo, Kunal
HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2022, 36 (05) : 911 - 928
[7] Structural and functional changes in COPD: What we have learned from imaging
Benlala, Ilyes
Laurent, Francois
Dournes, Gael
RESPIROLOGY, 2021, 26 (08) : 731 - 741
[8] Texture analysis imaging "what a clinical radiologist needs to know"
Corrias, Giuseppe
Micheletti, Giulio
Barberini, Luigi
Suri, Jasjit S.
Saba, Luca
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 146
[9] Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials: What Have We Learned From Magnetic Resonance Imaging
By, Samantha
Kahl, Anja
Cogswell, Petrice M.
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2025, 61 (02) : 579 - 594
[10] Are we at a crossroads or a plateau? Radiomics and machine learning in abdominal oncology imaging
Ronald M. Summers
Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 1985 - 1989

← 1 2 3 4 5 →