Integrating multiple datasets into spatially-explicit capture-recapture models to estimate the abundance of a locally scarce felid

被引:0
作者
Pablo Ferreras
José Jiménez
Francisco Díaz-Ruiz
Jorge Tobajas
Paulo Célio Alves
Pedro Monterroso
机构
[1] Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos,Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias
[2] IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM),CIBIO/InBIO, Centro de Investigacão em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos
[3] Universidad de Málaga,Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto
[4] Universidade do Porto,Wildlife Biology Program
[5] Rua do Campo Alegre,undefined
[6] University of Montana,undefined
来源
Biodiversity and Conservation | 2021年 / 30卷
关键词
European wildcat; Felid conservation; Integrated SCR models; Live capture; Camera trapping; Telemetry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The conservation of animal populations often requires the estimation of population size. Low density and secretive behaviour usually determine scarce data sources and hampers precise abundance estimations of carnivore populations. However, joint analysis of independent scarce data sources in a common modeling framework allows unbiased and precise estimates of population parameters. We aimed to estimate the density of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris) in a protected area of Spain, by combining independent datasets in a spatially-explicit capture-recapture (SCR) framework. Data from live-capture with individual identification, camera-trapping without individual identification and radio-tracking concurrently obtained were integrated in a joint SCR and count data model. Ten live captures of five wildcats were obtained with an effort of 2034 trap-days, whereas seven wildcat independent events were recorded in camera traps with 3628 camera-days. Two wildcats were radio-tagged and telemetry information on their movements was obtained. The integration of the different data sources improved the precision obtained by the standard SCR model. The mean (± SD) density estimated with the integrated model (0.038 ± 0.017 wildcats/km2, 95% highest posterior density 0.013–0.082) is among the lowest values ever reported for this species, despite corresponding to a highly protected area. Among the likely causes of such low density, low prey availability could have triggered an extinction vortex process. We postulate that the estimated low density could represent a common situation of wildcat populations in the southern Iberia, highlighting the need for further studies and urgent conservation actions in the furthermost southwestern range of this species in Europe.
引用
收藏
页码:4317 / 4335
页数:18
相关论文
共 331 条
[1]  
Anile S(2010)Estimation of European wildcat population size in Sicily (Italy) using camera trapping and capture–recapture analyses Ital J Zool 77 241-246
[2]  
Bizzarri L(2012)Population density estimation of the European wildcat ( Wildl Biol Pract 8 1-12
[3]  
Ragni B(2014)) in Sicily using camera trapping J Zool 293 252-261
[4]  
Anile S(2021)Wildcat population density on the Etna volcano, Italy: a comparison of density estimation methods Biol Conserv 261 239-685
[5]  
Amico C(2015)Survival and cause-specific mortality of European wildcat ( PLoS ONE 52 675-118
[6]  
Ragni B(2015)) across Europe PLoS ONE 45 112-79
[7]  
Anile S(2015)Monitoring rarity: the critically endangered Saharan cheetah as a flagship species for a threatened ecosystem J Appl Ecol 4 75-1360
[8]  
Ragni B(2011)Trapping elusive cats: using intensive camera trapping to estimate the density of a rare African felid Oryx 2 1-954
[9]  
Randi E(2001)Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes Anim Conserv 5 1351-426
[10]  
Mattucci F(2020)The wildcat R Package Version 7 936-2047