RSM Approach to Optimize an Engine Performance Combustion and Emissions at Part Load through Cylinder Deactivation

被引:0
作者
Sonu Ram
Raj Kumar Yadav
Indraj Singh
机构
[1] Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology,Mechanical Engineering Department
来源
International Journal of Automotive Technology | 2023年 / 24卷
关键词
Response surface methodology; Open ECU; Cylinder deactivation; Performance; Combustion; Emission;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article compares engine performance, combustion, and emissions at part-load in cylinder deactivation (CD) mode versus the traditional spark ignition mode. This comparison demonstrates the applicability of cylinder deactivation for a compact 3-cylinder engine. Experiments have been performed on a multi-point fuel injection engine having a 1000 cc displacement and equipped with an open engine control unit. A response surface approach has been applied to design experiments and parametric engine optimization. The analysis of variance test indicates that the load is the input factor that impacts the deactivation mode most. At 3500 RPM and 45 N·m load, the engine performs best in CD mode, with BSFC, BTE, CP, HRR and UHC values of 332.805 g/kW-hr, 25.26 %, 52.51 bar, 43.24 J, and 10.38 ppm, respectively. The validation test results for CD mode show that the percentage error for the BSFC, BTE, CP, HRR, and UHC responses was found to be 2.86, 2.91, 3.01, 3.47, and 3.97, respectively, within the acceptable range. As compared to SI mode, the current analysis has discovered a considerable decrease in BSFC (11.47 %), an improvement in BTE (12.25 %), a higher CP (80.65 %), a greater HRR (91.74 %), and a decrease in UHC (95.48 %).
引用
收藏
页码:1509 / 1517
页数:8
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]  
Ashley S(2004)Firing on half-cylinders Scientific American 291 20-22
[2]  
Deep A(2017)Experimental investigations on the influence of fuel injection timing and pressure on single cylinder CI engine fueled with 20% blend of castor biodiesel in diesel Fuel 210 15-22
[3]  
Sandhu S S(2019)In-cylinder CO J. Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 141 081018-3024
[4]  
Chander S(2016) sampling using skip-firing method Alexandria Engineering J. 55 3015-43
[5]  
Duckhouse M(2016)Performance and emissions assessment of n-butanol–methanol–gasoline blends as a fuel in spark-ignition engines Auto Tech Review 5 38-215
[6]  
Peckham M(2012)Cylinder deactivation—potentials & constraints SAE Int. J. Engines 5 207-1004
[7]  
Mason B(2021)Cylinder deactivation with mechanically fully variable valve train Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 146 111196-55
[8]  
Winward E(2017)Overview of the potential and limitations of cylinder deactivation Int. J. Engine Research 18 991-55
[9]  
Hammond M(2016)Cylinder deactivation during dynamic diesel engine operation Jurnal Teknologi 78 49-189
[10]  
Elfasakhany A(2010)Effect of cylinder deactivation strategies on engine performances using one-dimensional simulation technique Scientific American 302 50-2849