Comparative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, with or without methotrexate, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:0
|
作者
Young Ho Lee
Sang-Cheol Bae
Gwan Gyu Song
机构
[1] Korea University College of Medicine,Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital
[2] Hanyang University Medical Center,Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases
来源
Rheumatology International | 2015年 / 35卷
关键词
Tofacitinib; Efficacy; Safety; Rheumatoid arthritis; Network meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily, or in combination with methotrexate (MTX), in patients with active RA. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with active RA were included in this network meta-analysis. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine the direct and indirect evidence from the RCTs. Ten RCTs including 4867 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 21 pairwise comparisons including 11 direct comparisons of seven interventions. The ACR20 response rate was significantly higher in the tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX group than in the placebo and MTX groups (OR 7.56, 95 % credible interval (CrI) 3.07–21.16; OR 3.67, 95 % CrI 2.60–5.71, respectively). Ranking probabilities based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the ACR20 response rate (SUCRA = 0.9254), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.7156), adalimumab 40 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.6097), tofacitinib 10 mg (SUCRA = 0.5984), tofacitinib 5 mg (SUCRA = 0.4749), MTX (SUCRA = 0.1674), and placebo (SUCRA = 0.0086). In contrast, the safety based on the number of withdrawals due to adverse events did not differ significantly among the seven interventions. Tofacitinib, at dosages 5 and 10 mg twice daily, in combination with MTX, was the most efficacious intervention for active RA and was not associated with a significant risk for withdrawals due to adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:1965 / 1974
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and filgotinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; [Vergleich der Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit von Tofacitinib und Filgotinib bei Patienten mit aktiver rheumatoider Arthritis: eine Bayes-Netzwerk-Metaanalyse randomisierter kontrollierter Studien]
    Lee Y.H.
    Song G.G.
    Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie, 2020, 79 (6) : 590 - 603
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of iguratimod combined with methotrexate vs. methotrexate alone in rheumatoid arthritis A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, L. -J.
    Zhou, Y. -J.
    Wen, Z. -H.
    Tian, F.
    Li, J. -Y.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 2021, 80 (05): : 432 - 446
  • [43] Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Peficitinib Versus Tofacitinib and Baricitinib for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Yoshiya Tanaka
    Hiroyuki Okumura
    Soyoung Kim
    Julie Dorey
    Piotr Wojciechowski
    Justyna Chorąży
    Daisuke Kato
    Neil M. Schultz
    Rheumatology and Therapy, 2021, 8 : 729 - 750
  • [44] Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Ying
    Wong, Angel Y. S.
    Chan, Esther W.
    Lau, Wallis C. Y.
    Man, Kenneth K. C.
    Chui, Celine S. L.
    Worsley, Alan J.
    Wong, Ian C. K.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14
  • [45] Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ying He
    Angel YS Wong
    Esther W Chan
    Wallis CY Lau
    Kenneth KC Man
    Celine SL Chui
    Alan J Worsley
    Ian CK Wong
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14
  • [46] Efficacy and safety of baricitinib for active rheumatoid arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wu, Zhi-Peng
    Zhang, Pei
    Bai, Jian-Zhong
    Liang, Yuan
    He, Jin-Shan
    Wang, Jing-Cheng
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2018, 16 (03) : 2449 - 2459
  • [47] The Efficacy and Safety of Mainstream Medications for Patients With cDMARD-Naive Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis
    Cai, Weiyan
    Gu, Youyi
    Cui, Huanqin
    Cao, Yinyin
    Wang, Xiaoliang
    Yao, Yi
    Wang, Mingyu
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [48] Comparative efficacy and safety of rituximab, mycophenolate, and cyclophosphamide in active antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lee, Young Ho
    Song, Gwan Gyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 59 (10) : 645 - 653
  • [49] Comparative Efficacy of Antidepressants for Symptoms Remission of Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Si, Xiao-Bei
    Huo, Lin-Yu
    Bi, De-Ying
    Lan, Yu
    Zhang, Shuo
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 32 (10) : 843 - +
  • [50] Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for Septic Shock: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Huang, Peiying
    Chen, Yan
    Zhang, Haobo
    Chen, Bojun
    Zhao, Shuai
    Feng, Yuchao
    Lei, Sisi
    Wu, Qihua
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13