Breast cancer subtype discrimination using standardized 4-IHC and digital image analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Marina Gándara-Cortes
Ángel Vázquez-Boquete
Beatriz Fernández-Rodríguez
Patricia Viaño
Dora Ínsua
Alejandro Seoane-Seoane
Francisco Gude
Rosalía Gallego
Máximo Fraga
José R. Antúnez
Teresa Curiel
Eva Pérez-López
Tomás García-Caballero
机构
[1] University of Santiago de Compostela,Department of Morphological Sciences, School of Medicine
[2] Alvaro Cunqueiro University Hospital,Department of Pathology
[3] University Clinical Hospital,Department of Pathology
[4] University Clinical Hospital,Clinical Epidemiology Unit
[5] University Clinical Hospital,Department of Oncology
[6] University Hospital of Ourense,Department of Oncology
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2018年 / 472卷
关键词
Breast cancer; 4-IHC; Image analysis; Biological subtypes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Surrogate classification of intrinsic subtypes of invasive carcinomas by combined immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and Ki67 (4-IHC) has increased steadily since the 2011 St Gallen symposium, due to its rapid subtyping of tumors at a reasonable cost. An important step in improving 4-IHC reproducibility and reliability will be to provide reference values from the routine use of standardized 4-IHC followed by image analysis. The aims of the current study were (1) to analyze invasive breast carcinomas using standardized 4-IHC and quantitative image analysis and (2) to compare the results obtained in the classification of biological subtypes using current Ki67 and PR threshold values proposed by different authors to sub-classifying the luminal A-like and the luminal B-like (HER2-negative) subtypes. Five hundred twenty-one tumors were analyzed by standardized immunohistochemistry, with automatic image analysis, and HER2 FISH technique. Positivity for ER was found in 82.7% and for PR in 70.1% of cases. Using the Allred scoring system, hormone receptor results showed a bimodal distribution, particularly for ER. HER2 positivity was found in 15.7% of cases, and the mean Ki67 score was 32.3%. Using the most recently proposed surrogate definitions for the classification of luminal breast cancer subtypes, the percentages of different subtypes that we found were similar to those published with genomic platforms: 40.7% luminal A-like, 32.4% luminal B-like/HER2-negative, 9.8% luminal B-like/HER2-positive, 6.0% HER2-positive, and 11.1% triple negative. Standardized 4-IHC with automatic image analysis constitutes a low-cost method for surrogate definitions of biological subtypes of breast cancer that delivers accurate results in a day.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 203
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mammographic parameters as predictors of molecular subtype of breast cancer: a prospective analysis
    Nidhi Rana
    Shruti Thakur
    Vijay Thakur
    Arun Chauhan
    Anchana Gulati
    Sushma Makhaik
    Surgical and Experimental Pathology, 7 (1)
  • [42] The Performance and Clinical Applicability of HER2 Digital Image Analysis in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Dunenova, Gauhar
    Kalmataeva, Zhanna
    Kaidarova, Dilyara
    Dauletbaev, Nurlan
    Semenova, Yuliya
    Mansurova, Madina
    Grjibovski, Andrej
    Kassymbekova, Fatima
    Sarsembayev, Aidos
    Semenov, Daniil
    Glushkova, Natalya
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (15)
  • [43] Advancing Ki67 hotspot detection in breast cancer: a comparative analysis of automated digital image analysis algorithms
    Zwager, Mieke C.
    Yu, Shibo
    Buikema, Henk J.
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    Ramsing, Thomas W.
    Thagaard, Jeppe
    Koopman, Timco
    van Der Vegt, Bert
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2025, 86 (02) : 204 - 213
  • [44] Diagnosis of breast cancer in digital mammograms using independent component analysis and neural networks
    Campos, LFA
    Silva, AC
    Barros, AK
    PROGRESS IN PATTERN RECOGNITION, IMAGE ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3773 : 460 - 469
  • [45] Evaluating the Accuracy of Breast Cancer and Molecular Subtype Diagnosis by Ultrasound Image Deep Learning Model
    Zhang, Xianyu
    Li, Hui
    Wang, Chaoyun
    Cheng, Wen
    Zhu, Yuntao
    Li, Dapeng
    Jing, Hui
    Li, Shu
    Hou, Jiahui
    Li, Jiaying
    Li, Yingpu
    Zhao, Yashuang
    Mo, Hongwei
    Pang, Da
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [46] Body image alteration in women with breast cancer: A concept analysis using an evolutionary method
    Ahn, Jeonghee
    Suh, Eunyoung Eunice
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2023, 10 (05)
  • [47] Microvessel area using automated image analysis is reproducible and is associated with prognosis in breast cancer
    Sullivan, C. A. W.
    Ghosh, S.
    Ocal, I. T.
    Camp, R. L.
    Rimm, David L.
    Chung, G. G.
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2009, 40 (02) : 156 - 165
  • [48] Causal mediation analysis using high-dimensional image mediator bounded in irregular domain with an application to breast cancer
    Jiang, Shu
    Colditz, Graham A.
    BIOMETRICS, 2023, 79 (04) : 3728 - 3738
  • [49] Improving the breast cancer diagnosis using digital repositories
    Suarez Ortega, Cesar
    Franco Valiente, Jose M.
    Rubio del Solar, Manuel
    Daz Herrero, Guillermo
    Ramos Pollan, Raul
    Guevara Lopez, Miguel A.
    Gonzalez de Posada, Naimy
    Moura, Daniel C.
    Cunha, Pedro
    Ramos, Isabel
    Loureiro, Joana
    PROCEEDINGS IWBBIO 2013: INTERNATIONAL WORK-CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, : 571 - +
  • [50] Digital Validation in Breast Cancer Needle Biopsies: Comparison of Histological Grade and Biomarker Expression Assessment Using Conventional Light Microscopy, Whole Slide Imaging, and Digital Image Analysis
    Choi, Ji Eun
    Kim, Kyung-Hee
    Lee, Younju
    Kang, Dong-Wook
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2024, 14 (03):