Breast cancer subtype discrimination using standardized 4-IHC and digital image analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Marina Gándara-Cortes
Ángel Vázquez-Boquete
Beatriz Fernández-Rodríguez
Patricia Viaño
Dora Ínsua
Alejandro Seoane-Seoane
Francisco Gude
Rosalía Gallego
Máximo Fraga
José R. Antúnez
Teresa Curiel
Eva Pérez-López
Tomás García-Caballero
机构
[1] University of Santiago de Compostela,Department of Morphological Sciences, School of Medicine
[2] Alvaro Cunqueiro University Hospital,Department of Pathology
[3] University Clinical Hospital,Department of Pathology
[4] University Clinical Hospital,Clinical Epidemiology Unit
[5] University Clinical Hospital,Department of Oncology
[6] University Hospital of Ourense,Department of Oncology
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2018年 / 472卷
关键词
Breast cancer; 4-IHC; Image analysis; Biological subtypes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Surrogate classification of intrinsic subtypes of invasive carcinomas by combined immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and Ki67 (4-IHC) has increased steadily since the 2011 St Gallen symposium, due to its rapid subtyping of tumors at a reasonable cost. An important step in improving 4-IHC reproducibility and reliability will be to provide reference values from the routine use of standardized 4-IHC followed by image analysis. The aims of the current study were (1) to analyze invasive breast carcinomas using standardized 4-IHC and quantitative image analysis and (2) to compare the results obtained in the classification of biological subtypes using current Ki67 and PR threshold values proposed by different authors to sub-classifying the luminal A-like and the luminal B-like (HER2-negative) subtypes. Five hundred twenty-one tumors were analyzed by standardized immunohistochemistry, with automatic image analysis, and HER2 FISH technique. Positivity for ER was found in 82.7% and for PR in 70.1% of cases. Using the Allred scoring system, hormone receptor results showed a bimodal distribution, particularly for ER. HER2 positivity was found in 15.7% of cases, and the mean Ki67 score was 32.3%. Using the most recently proposed surrogate definitions for the classification of luminal breast cancer subtypes, the percentages of different subtypes that we found were similar to those published with genomic platforms: 40.7% luminal A-like, 32.4% luminal B-like/HER2-negative, 9.8% luminal B-like/HER2-positive, 6.0% HER2-positive, and 11.1% triple negative. Standardized 4-IHC with automatic image analysis constitutes a low-cost method for surrogate definitions of biological subtypes of breast cancer that delivers accurate results in a day.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 203
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Identification of Breast Cancer Subtype Specific MicroRNAs Using Survival Analysis to Find Their Role in Transcriptomic Regulation
    Denkiewicz, Michal
    Saha, Indrajit
    Rakshit, Somnath
    Sarkar, Jnanendra Prasad
    Plewczynski, Dariusz
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2019, 10
  • [32] Analysis of somatostatin receptor subtype mRNA expression in human breast cancer
    Evans, AA
    Crook, T
    Laws, SAM
    Gough, AC
    Royle, GT
    Primrose, JN
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 75 (06) : 798 - 803
  • [33] Quantitative analysis of breast cancer tissue composition and associations with tumor subtype
    Olsson, Linnea T.
    Williams, Lindsay A.
    Midkiff, Bentley R.
    Kirk, Erin L.
    Troester, Melissa A.
    Calhoun, Benjamin C.
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2022, 123 : 84 - 92
  • [34] Automatic image generation and stage prediction of breast cancer immunobiological through a proposed IHC-GAN model
    Saad, Afaf
    Ghatwary, Noha
    Gasser, Safa M.
    Elmahallawy, Mohamed S.
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [35] Finite element modelling and validation for breast cancer detection using digital image elasto-tomography
    Hina M. Ismail
    Chris G. Pretty
    Matthew K. Signal
    Marcus Haggers
    J. Geoffrey Chase
    Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2018, 56 : 1715 - 1729
  • [36] On using escort distributions in digital image analysis
    Ampilova, Natalia
    Soloviev, Igor
    Sergeev, Vladislav
    JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENTS IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (01) : 58 - 70
  • [37] Finite element modelling and validation for breast cancer detection using digital image elasto-tomography
    Ismail, Hina M.
    Pretty, Chris G.
    Signal, Matthew K.
    Haggers, Marcus
    Chase, J. Geoffrey
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2018, 56 (09) : 1715 - 1729
  • [38] Image Analysis of Breast Cancer Immunohistochemistry-stained Sections Using ImageJ: An RGB-based Model
    Vrekoussis, T.
    Chaniotis, V.
    Navrozoglou, I.
    Dousias, V.
    Pavlakis, K.
    Stathopoulos, E. N.
    Zoras, O.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 29 (12) : 4995 - 4998
  • [39] Digital image analysis improves the quality of subjective HER-2 expression scoring in breast cancer
    Skaland, Ivar
    Ovestad, Irene
    Janssen, Emiel A. M.
    Kjellevold, Kjell H.
    Helliesen, Tove
    Baak, Jan P. A.
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2008, 16 (02) : 185 - 190
  • [40] A simple digital image analysis system for automated Ki67 assessment in primary breast cancer
    Alataki, Anastasia
    Zabaglo, Lila
    Tovey, Holly
    Dodson, Andrew
    Dowsett, Mitch
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2021, 79 (02) : 200 - 209