Breast cancer subtype discrimination using standardized 4-IHC and digital image analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Marina Gándara-Cortes
Ángel Vázquez-Boquete
Beatriz Fernández-Rodríguez
Patricia Viaño
Dora Ínsua
Alejandro Seoane-Seoane
Francisco Gude
Rosalía Gallego
Máximo Fraga
José R. Antúnez
Teresa Curiel
Eva Pérez-López
Tomás García-Caballero
机构
[1] University of Santiago de Compostela,Department of Morphological Sciences, School of Medicine
[2] Alvaro Cunqueiro University Hospital,Department of Pathology
[3] University Clinical Hospital,Department of Pathology
[4] University Clinical Hospital,Clinical Epidemiology Unit
[5] University Clinical Hospital,Department of Oncology
[6] University Hospital of Ourense,Department of Oncology
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2018年 / 472卷
关键词
Breast cancer; 4-IHC; Image analysis; Biological subtypes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Surrogate classification of intrinsic subtypes of invasive carcinomas by combined immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and Ki67 (4-IHC) has increased steadily since the 2011 St Gallen symposium, due to its rapid subtyping of tumors at a reasonable cost. An important step in improving 4-IHC reproducibility and reliability will be to provide reference values from the routine use of standardized 4-IHC followed by image analysis. The aims of the current study were (1) to analyze invasive breast carcinomas using standardized 4-IHC and quantitative image analysis and (2) to compare the results obtained in the classification of biological subtypes using current Ki67 and PR threshold values proposed by different authors to sub-classifying the luminal A-like and the luminal B-like (HER2-negative) subtypes. Five hundred twenty-one tumors were analyzed by standardized immunohistochemistry, with automatic image analysis, and HER2 FISH technique. Positivity for ER was found in 82.7% and for PR in 70.1% of cases. Using the Allred scoring system, hormone receptor results showed a bimodal distribution, particularly for ER. HER2 positivity was found in 15.7% of cases, and the mean Ki67 score was 32.3%. Using the most recently proposed surrogate definitions for the classification of luminal breast cancer subtypes, the percentages of different subtypes that we found were similar to those published with genomic platforms: 40.7% luminal A-like, 32.4% luminal B-like/HER2-negative, 9.8% luminal B-like/HER2-positive, 6.0% HER2-positive, and 11.1% triple negative. Standardized 4-IHC with automatic image analysis constitutes a low-cost method for surrogate definitions of biological subtypes of breast cancer that delivers accurate results in a day.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 203
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implementation of Digital Image Analysis in Assessment of Ki67 Index in Breast Cancer
    Vanderschelden, Rachel K.
    Jerome, Jacob A.
    Gonzalez, Daniel
    Seigh, Lindsey
    Carter, Gloria J.
    Clark, Beth Z.
    Elishaev, Esther
    Louis Fine, Jeffrey
    Harinath, Lakshmi
    Jones, Mirka W.
    Villatoro, Tatiana M.
    Soong, Thing Rinda
    Yu, Jing
    Zhao, Chengquan
    Hartman, Doug
    Bhargava, Rohit
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2024, 32 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [22] Validation of the IHC4 Breast Cancer Prognostic Algorithm Using Multiple Approaches on the Multinational TEAM Clinical Trial
    Bartlett, John M. S.
    Christiansen, Jason
    Gustavson, Mark
    Rimm, David L.
    Piper, Tammy
    van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
    Hasenburg, Annette
    Kieback, Dirk G.
    Putter, Hein
    Markopoulos, Christos J.
    Dirix, Luc Y.
    Seynaeve, Caroline
    Rea, Daniel W.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 140 (01) : 66 - 74
  • [23] Breast cancer image analysis using deep learning techniques - a survey
    Koshy, Soumya Sara
    Anbarasi, L. Jani
    Jawahar, Malathy
    Ravi, Vinayakumar
    HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 12 (06) : 1133 - 1155
  • [24] Breast cancer image analysis using deep learning techniques – a survey
    Soumya Sara Koshy
    L. Jani Anbarasi
    Malathy Jawahar
    Vinayakumar Ravi
    Health and Technology, 2022, 12 : 1133 - 1155
  • [25] Subtype switching in breast cancer brain metastases: a multicenter analysis
    Hulsbergen, Alexander F. C.
    Claes, An
    Kavouridis, Vasileios K.
    Ansaripour, Ali
    Nogarede, Claudine
    Hughes, Melissa E.
    Smith, Timothy R.
    Brastianos, Priscilla K.
    Verhoeff, Joost J. C.
    Lin, Nancy U.
    Broekman, Marike L. D.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2020, 22 (08) : 1173 - 1181
  • [26] Immunohistochemical image analysis of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer
    Furukawa Y.
    Kimijima I.
    Abe R.
    Breast Cancer, 1998, 5 (4) : 375 - 380
  • [27] AGNOR AND BREAST-CANCER - A STUDY BY IMAGE-ANALYSIS
    RONCO, A
    LARRAN, J
    LOPEZ, A
    VILCHES, J
    HISTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1994, 9 (02) : 309 - 313
  • [28] Ki-67 evaluation using deep-learning model-assisted digital image analysis in breast cancer
    Matsumoto, Hirofumi
    Miyata, Ryota
    Tsuruta, Yuma
    Nakada, Norihiro
    Koki, Ayako
    Unesoko, Mikiko
    Abe, Norie
    Zaha, Hisamitsu
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2025, 86 (03) : 460 - 471
  • [29] Enhanced Accuracy of Breast Cancer Detection in Digital Mammograms using Wavelet Analysis
    Padmanabhan, Sharanya
    Sundararajan, Raji
    2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE VISION AND IMAGE PROCESSING (MVIP), 2012, : 153 - 156
  • [30] Molecular breast cancer subtype identification using photoacoustic spectral analysis and machine learning at the biomacromolecular level
    Li, Jiayan
    Chen, Yingna
    Ye, Wanli
    Zhang, Mengjiao
    Zhu, Jingtao
    Zhi, Wenxiang
    Cheng, Qian
    PHOTOACOUSTICS, 2023, 30