Breast cancer subtype discrimination using standardized 4-IHC and digital image analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Marina Gándara-Cortes
Ángel Vázquez-Boquete
Beatriz Fernández-Rodríguez
Patricia Viaño
Dora Ínsua
Alejandro Seoane-Seoane
Francisco Gude
Rosalía Gallego
Máximo Fraga
José R. Antúnez
Teresa Curiel
Eva Pérez-López
Tomás García-Caballero
机构
[1] University of Santiago de Compostela,Department of Morphological Sciences, School of Medicine
[2] Alvaro Cunqueiro University Hospital,Department of Pathology
[3] University Clinical Hospital,Department of Pathology
[4] University Clinical Hospital,Clinical Epidemiology Unit
[5] University Clinical Hospital,Department of Oncology
[6] University Hospital of Ourense,Department of Oncology
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2018年 / 472卷
关键词
Breast cancer; 4-IHC; Image analysis; Biological subtypes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Surrogate classification of intrinsic subtypes of invasive carcinomas by combined immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and Ki67 (4-IHC) has increased steadily since the 2011 St Gallen symposium, due to its rapid subtyping of tumors at a reasonable cost. An important step in improving 4-IHC reproducibility and reliability will be to provide reference values from the routine use of standardized 4-IHC followed by image analysis. The aims of the current study were (1) to analyze invasive breast carcinomas using standardized 4-IHC and quantitative image analysis and (2) to compare the results obtained in the classification of biological subtypes using current Ki67 and PR threshold values proposed by different authors to sub-classifying the luminal A-like and the luminal B-like (HER2-negative) subtypes. Five hundred twenty-one tumors were analyzed by standardized immunohistochemistry, with automatic image analysis, and HER2 FISH technique. Positivity for ER was found in 82.7% and for PR in 70.1% of cases. Using the Allred scoring system, hormone receptor results showed a bimodal distribution, particularly for ER. HER2 positivity was found in 15.7% of cases, and the mean Ki67 score was 32.3%. Using the most recently proposed surrogate definitions for the classification of luminal breast cancer subtypes, the percentages of different subtypes that we found were similar to those published with genomic platforms: 40.7% luminal A-like, 32.4% luminal B-like/HER2-negative, 9.8% luminal B-like/HER2-positive, 6.0% HER2-positive, and 11.1% triple negative. Standardized 4-IHC with automatic image analysis constitutes a low-cost method for surrogate definitions of biological subtypes of breast cancer that delivers accurate results in a day.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 203
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breast cancer subtype discrimination using standardized 4-IHC and digital image analysis
    Gandara-Cortes, Marina
    Vazquez-Boquete, Angel
    Fernandez-Rodriguez, Beatriz
    Viano, Patricia
    Insua, Dora
    Seoane-Seoane, Alejandro
    Gude, Francisco
    Gallego, Rosalia
    Fraga, Maximo
    Antunez, Jose R.
    Curiel, Teresa
    Perez-Lopez, Eva
    Garcia-Caballero, Tomas
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2018, 472 (02) : 195 - 203
  • [2] 4-IHC classification of breast cancer subtypes in a large cohort of a clinical cancer registry: use in clinical routine for therapeutic decisions and its effect on survival
    Inwald, Elisabeth Christine
    Koller, M.
    Klinkhammer-Schalke, M.
    Zeman, F.
    Hofstaedter, F.
    Gerstenhauer, M.
    Brockhoff, G.
    Ortmann, O.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 153 (03) : 647 - 658
  • [3] 4-IHC classification of breast cancer subtypes in a large cohort of a clinical cancer registry: use in clinical routine for therapeutic decisions and its effect on survival
    Elisabeth Christine Inwald
    M. Koller
    M. Klinkhammer-Schalke
    F. Zeman
    F. Hofstädter
    M. Gerstenhauer
    G. Brockhoff
    O. Ortmann
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2015, 153 : 647 - 658
  • [4] Objective measurement of breast cancer oestrogen receptor status through digital image analysis
    Mofidi, R
    Walsh, R
    Ridgway, PF
    Crotty, T
    McDermott, EW
    Keaveny, TV
    Duffy, MJ
    Hill, ADK
    O'Higgins, N
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 29 (01): : 20 - 24
  • [5] Tumour Stroma Ratio Assessment Using Digital Image Analysis Predicts Survival in Triple Negative and Luminal Breast Cancer
    Millar, Ewan K. A.
    Browne, Lois H.
    Beretov, Julia
    Lee, Kirsty
    Lynch, Jodi
    Swarbrick, Alexander
    Graham, Peter H.
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (12) : 1 - 14
  • [6] Breast Cancer Detection in Qatar: Evaluation of Mammography Image Quality Using A Standardized Assessment Tool
    Narayan, Anand K.
    Al-Naemi, Huda
    Aly, Antar
    Kharita, Mohammad Hassan
    Khera, Ruhani Doda
    Hajaj, Mohamad
    Rehani, Madan M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2020, 16 (02) : 124 - 128
  • [7] Breast Cancer Histopathology Image Analysis: A Review
    Veta, Mitko
    Pluim, Josien P. W.
    van Diest, Paul J.
    Viergever, Max A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 61 (05) : 1400 - 1411
  • [8] Image analysis and morphometry in the diagnosis of breast cancer
    Gil, J
    Wu, HS
    Wang, BY
    MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2002, 59 (02) : 109 - 118
  • [9] Reliability and Variability of Ki-67 Digital Image Analysis Methods for Clinical Diagnostics in Breast Cancer
    Dawe, Melanie
    Shi, Wei
    Liu, Tian Y.
    Lajkosz, Katherine
    Shibahara, Yukiko
    Gopal, Nakita E. K.
    Geread, Rokshana
    Mirjahanmardi, Seyed
    Wei, Carrie X.
    Butt, Sehrish
    Abdalla, Moustafa
    Manolescu, Sabrina
    Liang, Sheng-Ben
    Chadwick, Dianne
    Roehrl, Michael H. A.
    McKee, Trevor D.
    Adeoye, Adewunmi
    McCready, David
    Khademi, April
    Liu, Fei-Fei
    Fyles, Anthony
    Done, Susan J.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2024, 104 (05)
  • [10] Review of the current state of digital image analysis in breast pathology
    Chang, Martin C.
    Mrkonjic, Miralem
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (06) : 1208 - 1212