Single print optimisation of fused filament fabrication parameters

被引:0
作者
Gabriel Pieter Greeff
Meinhard Schilling
机构
[1] Technische Universität Braunschweig,Institut für Elektrische Messtechnik und Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik
来源
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | 2018年 / 99卷
关键词
Fused filament fabrication; Material extrusion; Fused deposition modelling; Design of experiments; Process optimisation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Single print optimisation (SPO) of process parameters, for the improvement of dimensional accuracy of an additively manufactured (AM) printed part with fused filament fabrication (FFF), is presented. A test object is sliced with different slicer parameters, as determined by a design of experiments (DOE) run table. The resulting files are merged into a single G-code file, which is used to perform a single print run. This prints the objects sequentially in super layers, where a super layer consists of several normal layers of sequentially printed parts limited by the printer Z-axis clearance. The test object is designed to be measured with accessible, affordable and easy-to-use dimensional measurement instruments. The goal of the optimisation is to improve the deposition of a single track, since all FFF objects are built up from several extrusions called tracks in the printer XY plane. The track height and width are key quantifiable measurands. Retraction effectiveness is also considered, with a qualitative response variable called stringing length. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression is used to fit linear models to the three response variables. The bed level, as a function of X and Y coordinates, is used to improve part height accuracy. Track width is modelled with liquefier temperature and feed speed, whilst stringing length is modelled as a function of temperature. The models are verified by selecting an operation point which maximises print speed and minimises a cost function for the track width.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 858
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Bikas H(2016)Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83 389-405
  • [2] Stavropoulos P(2014)A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling Rapid Prototyp J 20 192-204
  • [3] Chryssolouris G(2011)Reprap—the replicating rapid prototyper Robotica 29 177-191
  • [4] Turner BN(2016)Fast deviation simulation for ‘fused deposition modeling’ process Procedia CIRP 43 327-332
  • [5] Strong R(2018)The effect of process parameters in fused deposition modelling on bonding degree and mechanical properties Rapid Prototyp J 24 80-92
  • [6] Gold SA(2018)Functional Quantitative and Qualitative Models for Quality Modeling in a Fused Deposition Modeling Process IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 15 393-403
  • [7] Jones R(2015)Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects Adv Manuf 3 42-53
  • [8] Haufe P(2014)Process parameter optimization for fused deposition modeling using response surface methodology combined with fuzzy inference system Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73 87-100
  • [9] Sells E(2017)Mechanical property parametric appraisal of fused deposition modeling parts based on the gray Taguchi method Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89 2387-2397
  • [10] Iravani P(2014)Accuracy prediction in fused deposition modeling Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73 913-928