Three-dimensional limit variation analysis on the ultimate pullout capacity of the anchor cables based on the Hoek-Brown failure criterion

被引:0
作者
Zuo, Shi [1 ]
Zhao, Lianheng [2 ]
Hu, Shihong [3 ]
机构
[1] Changsha Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Changsha 410022, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Hunan Prov Key Lab Disaster Prevent & Mitigat Rai, Key Lab Heavy Haul Railway Engn Struct, Minist Educ, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Anchor cable; Ultimate pullout capacity (UPC); Failure model; Variation analysis; Hoek- Brown failure criterion; UPLIFT CAPACITY; STABILITY ANALYSIS; PLATE ANCHORS; OUT CAPACITY; ROCK; STRENGTH; TUNNELS; SLOPES; MECHANISM; PILES;
D O I
10.1007/s11629-023-8280-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Only simplified two-dimensional model and a single failure mode are adopted to calculate the ultimate pullout capacity (UPC) of anchor cables in most previous research. This study focuses on a more comprehensive combination failure mode that consists of bond failure of an anchorage body and failure of an anchored rock mass. The threedimensional ultimate pullout capacity of the anchor cables is calculated based on the Hoek -Brown failure criterion and variation analysis method. The numerical solution for the curvilinear function in fracture plane is obtained based on the finite difference theory, which more accurately reflects the failure state of the anchor cable, as opposed to that being assumed in advance. The results reveal that relying solely on a single failure mode for UPC calculations has limitations, as changes in parameter values not only directly impact the UPC value but also can alter the failure model and thus the calculation method.
引用
收藏
页码:1036 / 1047
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Aghajanzadeh SM, 2017, ING SISMICA-ITAL, V34, P3
[2]   Comparison of Hoek-Brown and Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion for deep open coal mine slope stability [J].
Aksoy, Cemalettin O. ;
Uyar, Guzin G. ;
Ozcelik, Yilmaz .
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2016, 60 (05) :809-828
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, Underground excavations in rock
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1975, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstracts, DOI DOI 10.1016/0148-9062(75)90476-3
[5]   A relation between safety factors with respect to strength and height of slopes [J].
Baker, R. .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2006, 33 (4-5) :275-277
[6]   Nonlinear Mohr envelopes based on triaxial data [J].
Baker, R .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 130 (05) :498-506
[7]   Pseudo-static stability analysis of rock slopes reinforced by passive bolts using the generalized Hoek-Brown criterion [J].
Belghali, Mounir ;
Saada, Zied ;
Garnier, Denis ;
Maghous, Samir .
JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 9 (04) :659-670
[8]   Uplift Capacity of Anchors in Layered Sand Using Finite-Element Limit Analysis: Formulation and Results [J].
Bhattacharya, Paramita ;
Kumar, Jyant .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2016, 16 (03)
[9]   Determination of residual strength parameters of jointed rock masses using the GSI system [J].
Cai, M. ;
Kaiser, P. K. ;
Tasaka, Y. ;
Minami, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2007, 44 (02) :247-265
[10]   Analytical and Numerical Study of the Mechanics of Rockbolt Reinforcement around Tunnels in Rock Masses [J].
Carranza-Torres, C. .
ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2009, 42 (02) :175-228