An econometric analysis of sub-national Clean Development Mechanism performance in China

被引:0
作者
Jinshan Zhu
Hui Yao
Yingkai Tang
Liyong Wang
机构
[1] Law School,Department of Planning and Development
[2] Cornell University,Business School
[3] China Huaneng Group,School of Economics
[4] Sichuan University,undefined
[5] SKJC 201007,undefined
[6] Central University of Finance and Economics,undefined
来源
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | 2015年 / 20卷
关键词
Clean Development Mechanism; Case study; Econometrics; Geographical fairness; Sub-national approach;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this research is to conduct a quantitative analysis of China’s sub-national Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) performance as a case study of unbalanced CDM performance within a CDM host country. Key results are as follows: First, investment climate is the most decisive factor, which can explain about 48 % (adjusted R-squared) of China’s sub-national CDM performance at significance level 0.1 %. Second, general economic and investment conditions have a collective determination effect, which together explain about 50 % (adjusted R-squared) of sub-nationall CDM performance. Third, when compared with previous research in which the economic and investment conditions explain about 55 % (adjusted R-squared) of unbalanced CDM performance on the international level, it becomes clear that the impact of the economic and investment conditions on China’s sub-national unbalanced CDM performance resembles the unbalanced performance at the international level. Hence, we conclude that the sub-national unbalanced CDM performance in China is similar to that of the international level, and is influenced by similar determining factors. This finding casts doubt on the previous policy suggestion to fix the geographically unbalanced CDM performance simply by national discrimination, such as by revoking CDM eligibility of an entire host country. Consequently, a more tailored approach is advisable to manage that eligibility on the sub-national level. This is a more precise response to geographically unbalanced CDM performance and is less likely to discourage participation of the dominant CDM host countries in international climate mitigation.
引用
收藏
页码:1137 / 1153
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Archibugi D(2004)A new indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCo) World Dev 32 629-654
[2]  
Coco A(2006)Planting trees to mitigate climate change: contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism Global Environ Polit 6 50-75
[3]  
Bäckstrand K(2011)Would preferential access measures be sufficient to overcome current barriers to CDM projects in least developed countries? Clim Dev 3 123-142
[4]  
Lövbrand E(2007)A CER discounting scheme could save climate change regime after 2012 Clim Policy 7 171-176
[5]  
Castro P(2008)The Clean Development Mechanism and the international diffusion of technologies: an empirical study Energ Policy 36 1273-1283
[6]  
Michaelowa A(2007)CDM: taking stock and looking forward Energ Policy 35 15-28
[7]  
Chung RK(2009)Varieties of carbon governance in newly industrializing countries J Environ Dev 18 327-345
[8]  
Dechezlepretre A(2008)The Clean Development Mechanism in China and India: a comparative institutional analysis Public Admin Dev 28 351-362
[9]  
Glachant M(2006)Host country attractiveness for CDM non-sink projects Energ Policy 34 2173-2184
[10]  
Meniere Y(2009)Development challenges under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)—can renewable energy initiatives be put in place before peak oil? Energ Policy 37 237-245