This paper compares taxes and tradable permits when used to regulate a competitive and polluting downstream industry that can purchase an abatement technology from a monopolistic upstream industry. Second-best policies are derived for the full range of the abatement technology’s emission intensities and marginal abatement costs. The second-best permit quantity can be both above or below the socially optimal emission level. Explicit consideration of the output market provides further insights on how market power distorts the allocation in the downstream industry. The ranking between permits and taxes is ambiguous in general, but taxes weakly dominate permits if full diffusion is socially optimal. In addition, it is analysed how a cap on the permit price affects the diffusion of an abatement technology.
机构:
Anhui Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhu 241000, Peoples R China
Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing 100029, Peoples R ChinaAnhui Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhu 241000, Peoples R China
Zhang, Qiong
Yang, Hangjun
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing 100029, Peoples R ChinaAnhui Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhu 241000, Peoples R China
Yang, Hangjun
Wang, Qiang
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing 100029, Peoples R ChinaAnhui Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhu 241000, Peoples R China
Wang, Qiang
Zhang, Anming
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ British Columbia, Sauder Sch Business, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, CanadaAnhui Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhu 241000, Peoples R China