Polarity- and Intensity-Independent Modulation of Timing During Delay Eyeblink Conditioning Using Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

被引:0
作者
Jessica Mitroi
Leah P. Burroughs
Alexandra B. Moussa-Tooks
Amanda R. Bolbecker
Nancy B. Lundin
Brian F. O’Donnell
William P. Hetrick
机构
[1] Indiana University Bloomington,Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences
[2] Indiana University Bloomington,Program in Neuroscience
[3] Indiana University School of Medicine,Department of Psychiatry
来源
The Cerebellum | 2020年 / 19卷
关键词
Cerebellum; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Associative learning; Eyeblink conditioning; Polarity; Intensity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Delay eyeblink conditioning (dEBC) is widely used to assess cerebellar-dependent associative motor learning, including precise timing processes. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), noninvasive brain stimulation used to indirectly excite and inhibit select brain regions, may be a promising tool for understanding how functional integrity of the cerebellum influences dEBC behavior. The aim of this study was to assess whether tDCS-induced inhibition (cathodal) and excitation (anodal) of the cerebellum differentially impact timing of dEBC. A standard 10-block dEBC paradigm was administered to 102 healthy participants. Participants were randomized to stimulation conditions in a double-blind, between-subjects sham-controlled design. Participants received 20-min active (anodal or cathodal) stimulation at 1.5 mA (n = 20 anodal, n = 22 cathodal) or 2 mA (n = 19 anodal, n = 21 cathodal) or sham stimulation (n = 20) concurrently with dEBC training. Stimulation intensity and polarity effects on percent conditioned responses (CRs) and CR peak and onset latency were examined using repeated-measures analyses of variance. Acquisition of CRs increased over time at a similar rate across sham and all active stimulation groups. CR peak and onset latencies were later, i.e., closer to air puff onset, in all active stimulation groups compared to the sham group. Thus, tDCS facilitated cerebellar-dependent timing of dEBC, irrespective of stimulation intensity and polarity. These findings highlight the feasibility of using tDCS to modify cerebellar-dependent functions and provide further support for cerebellar contributions to human eyeblink conditioning and for exploring therapeutic tDCS interventions for cerebellar dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 391
页数:8
相关论文
共 215 条
  • [1] Zagon IS(1977)Neural populations in the human cerebellum: estimations from isolated cell nuclei Brain Res 127 279-282
  • [2] PJ ML(2008)Cerebellum-like structures and their implications for cerebellar function Annu Rev Neurosci 31 1-24
  • [3] Smith S(2009)Cerebellum and nonmotor function Annu Rev Neurosci 32 413-434
  • [4] Bell CC(2013)The cerebellum and cognitive function: 25 years of insight from anatomy and neuroimaging Neuron 80 807-815
  • [5] Han V(2017)The cerebellum: adaptive prediction for movement and cognition Trends Cogn Sci 21 313-332
  • [6] Sawtell NB(2018)The cerebellum and learning of non-motor associations in individuals at clinical-high risk for psychosis Neuroimage Clin 19 137-146
  • [7] Strick PL(2008)Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum Nat Rev Neurosci 9 304-242
  • [8] Dum RP(2009)The predictive brain state: asynchrony in disorders of attention? Neuroscientist 15 232-108
  • [9] Fiez JA(2005)Eyeblink conditioning deficits indicate timing and cerebellar abnormalities in schizophrenia Brain Cogn 58 94-969
  • [10] Buckner RL(1993)Classical conditioning after cerebellar lesions in humans Behav Neurosci 107 748-455