Ecological effect life cycle assessment of house buildings based on emergy footprint model

被引:0
作者
Mengyang He
Yang Wang
Haotian Ma
机构
[1] Shanghai University of Electric Power,Institute of Economics and Management
来源
Scientific Reports | / 13卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Construction is an important sector for climate action. The construction, operation and maintenance, demolition and disposal stages of house buildings consume many resources and have a significant impact on society, the economy and the environment. To assess such efforts, we propose the emergy footprint model of house buildings, which can quantitatively analyse the ecological effect in the house buildings life cycle. The research shows the following. China’s ecological efficiency of the housing sector is characterized by improvement. In the house building fifty-year life cycle, the emergy footprint of the operation and maintenance stage is the largest (75.92%), followed by the construction stage (21.95%), but the emergy footprint intensity of the latter is 4.82 times that of the former. Reducing energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in the operation and maintenance stage is the key to reducing the life cycle emergy footprint of house buildings. The ecological impact coefficient of house buildings is negatively exponentially correlated with their service life. It reaches ecological break-even when the service period of the house building is equal to 36.73 years. If the house building is demolished after less than nine years of service, the impact is extremely unfavourable.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Duan HY(2020)Characteristics of reginal energy consumption of China’s construction industry from the perspective of life cycle J. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 30 57-65
  • [2] Chen SY(2021)Comparing the environmental impacts of wooden buildings in Spain, Slovenia, and Germany J. Clean Prod. 329 1-23
  • [3] Liu YY(2021)Mechanisms underlying operational energy consumption of buildings for low carbon city construction: A review Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 32 2644-2652
  • [4] Alberto QG(2019)Regionalized inventory data in LCA of public housing: A comparison between two conventional typologies in southern Brazil J. Clean Prod. 238 1-10
  • [5] Erwin MS(2020)Comparative BIM-based Life Cycle Assessment of Uruguayan timber and concrete-masonry single-family houses in design stage J. Clean Prod. 277 1-13
  • [6] Eva PN(2021)Sustainability in the construction industry: A systematic review of the literature J. Clean Prod. 289 1-15
  • [7] Michael DB(2020)Life cycle assessment in the building design process—A systematic literature review J. Build. Environ. 185 1-12
  • [8] Ye H(2018)Life cycle assessment of geopolymer concrete J. Constr. Build. Mater. 190 170-177
  • [9] Yan H(2022)Building material toxicity and life cycle assessment: A systematic critical review J. Clean Prod. 341 1-12
  • [10] Zhang RM(2005)Quantitative calculation of construction initial energy use in residential building J. HUST. (Urban Sci. Edn.) 22 54-57