Comparative ecological network pattern analysis: a case of Nanchang

被引:0
作者
Binbin Ma
Zhu-an Chen
Xiaojian Wei
Xiuquan Li
Liting Zhang
机构
[1] East China University of Technology,Key Laboratory for Digital Land and Resources in Jiangxi Province, Key Laboratory for Digital Land and Resources in Jiangxi Province
[2] East China University of Technology,School of Geomatics
[3] Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment (Nanjing Normal University),undefined
[4] Ministry of Education,undefined
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Ecological source; Ecological network; MSPA; MCR; Ecological corridors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Urban–ecological landscape connectivity and pattern optimization can significantly enhance biodiversity and sustainable development capacity, which play an important role in continued ecosystem functioning. Previous studies identified ecological sources based on the area threshold method or combination with morphological spatial pattern analysis and the landscape connectivity index (CMSPACI) method, but few studies have compared the advantages, disadvantages, and applicability of the two methods. In this paper, taking Nanchang as the study area, we address the ecological sources via area threshold and the CMSPACI method. Then, the minimum cost distance method is used to generate potential corridors of different methods, and the differences in ecological networks are analyzed. Finally, the circuit theory is used to identify barriers, and we provide targeted recommendations for ecological network pattern optimization in the study area. The results show that (1) the ecological sources extracted by different methods are different. The ecological sources extracted by the area threshold are far away from the surrounding sources, and the landscape connectivity is low. The ecological sources identified by the CMSPACI method are closely related to the surrounding sources, and the landscape connectivity is high. (2) Compared with the area threshold method, the habitat quality of corridors under the CMSPACI method is better, and the interaction intensity between patches is larger. (3) There is little difference in the number of ecological barriers under different methods; all of them are located between patches or on the edge of patches, and most of them are roads or construction land. Overall, the area threshold method is simpler. Ecological sources can be effectively addressed through the CMSPACI method, and the landscape connectivity of the ecological network will be better. This study provides an important reference for the selection of ecological sources in the construction of ecological networks.
引用
收藏
页码:37423 / 37434
页数:11
相关论文
共 154 条
[31]  
Gwin L(2012)The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks Science 335 973-977
[32]  
Brashares JS(2010)A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape Ecography 33 523-537
[33]  
Feist BE(2007)A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study Landsc Urban Plan 83 91-103
[34]  
Buhle ER(1993)Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure Oikos 68 571-573
[35]  
Baldwin DH(2015)An evaluation framework based on sustainability-related indicators for the comparison of conceptual approaches for ecological networks Ecol Indic 52 444-457
[36]  
Spromberg JA(2009)Mapping functional connectivity Ecol Indic 9 64-71
[37]  
Damm SE(2008)Habitat suitability modelling to correlate gene flow with landscape connectivity Landsc Ecol 23 989-1000
[38]  
Davis JW(2020)Urban expansion patterns and their driving forces based on the center of gravity-GTWR model: a case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration J Geogr Sci 30 297-318
[39]  
Scholz NL(2010)A national assessment of green infrastructure and change for the conterminous United States using morphological image processing Landsc Urban Plan 94 186-195
[40]  
Hong SH(2006)Maryland’s Green Infrastructure Assessment: development of a comprehensive approach to land conservation Landsc Urban Plan 77 94-110