Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional ultrasound measurement of follicular volume: Are they comparable?

被引:16
作者
Ahmed Amer
Mohamad Eid Hammadeh
Mohamed Kolkailah
Abdel-Al Ghandour
机构
[1] Department of Obstetrics, Al-Azhar University, Cairo
[2] Department of Obstetrics, University of Saarland
关键词
Follicular volume; Three-dimensional ultrasound; Two-dimensional ultrasound;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-002-0315-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To compare the accuracy of three-dimensional (3-D) versus two-dimensional (2-D) ultrasonography (U/S) in the measurement of follicular volume and identification of cumulus oophorus complex, thirty women were selected. Women who undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) using the long protocol of GnRH agonist were scanned by 2-D and 3-D ultrasonography before follicular aspiration. The volume of aspirated follicular fluid was compared with corresponding volume measured by 3-D and 2-D ultrasonography. It was found that, the high accuracy of 3-D U/S measurement of follicular volume is demonstrated clearly by limits of agreement which were within 1 ml of the true volume. While, the 2-D U/S produced limits of agreement those were up to 3.5 ml above or 2.5 ml below the true volume. Also, 3-D U/S could identify cumulus oophorus complex in 86% of cases. From this study, it was concluded that 3-D U/S system is more accurate than 2-D U/S in the measurement of the true follicular volume. Also, 3-D U/S is superior to 2-D U/S for identification of cumulus oophorus complex.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 157
页数:2
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Bonilla-Musoles F., Raga F., Osborne N.G., Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses, Gynecol Oncol, 59, pp. 129-135, (1995)
[2]  
Feichtinger W., Transvaginal three-dimensional imaging, Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol, 3, pp. 375-378, (1993)
[3]  
Feichtinger W., Follicle aspiration with interactive three-dimensional digital imaging (Voluson): A step toward real-time puncturing under three-dimensional ultrasound control, Fertil Steril, 70, pp. 374-377, (1998)
[4]  
Kyei-Mensah A., Maconochie N., Zaidi J., Et al., Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound: Reproducibility of ovarian and endometrial volume measurement, Fertil Steril, 66, pp. 718-722, (1996)
[5]  
Navot D., Margoliath E.J., Laufer N., Et al., Periovulatory 17 beta estradiol pattern in conception cycles during menotropin treatment of anovulatory infertility, Fertil Steril, 47, pp. 234-237, (1987)
[6]  
Pellicer A., Ardiles G., Neuspiller F., Remohi J., Simon C., Bonilla-Musoles F., Evaluation of the ovarian reserve in young low responders with normal basal levels of follicle-stimulating hormone using three-dimensional ultrasonography, Fertil Steril, 70, pp. 671-675, (1998)
[7]  
Penzias A.S., Emmi A.M., Dubey A.K., Et al., Ultrasound prediction of follicle volume: Is the mean diameter reflective?, Fertil Steril, 62, pp. 1274-1276, (1994)
[8]  
Pretorius D.H., Nelson T.R., Three-dimensional ultrasound, Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol, 5, pp. 219-221, (1995)
[9]  
Robert Y., Dubrulle F., Gaillandre L., Et al., Ultrasound assessment of ovarian stroma hypertrophy in hyperandrogenism and ovulation disorders: Visual analysis versus computerized quantification, Fertil Steril, 64, pp. 307-312, (1995)
[10]  
Schild R.L., Knobloch C., Dorn C., Fimmers R., Van der Ven H., Hansmann M., The role of ovarian volume in an in vitro fertilization programme as assessed by 3D ultrasound, Arch Gynecol Obstet, 265, pp. 65-72, (2001)