Laboratory bioassay for canola (Brassica napus) allelopathy

被引:2
作者
Asaduzzaman M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
An M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pratley J.E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luckett D.J. [2 ,4 ]
Lemerle D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] School of Agricultural and Wine Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, 2678, NSW
[2] Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, 2650, NSW
[3] Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, 2678, NSW
[4] NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga, 2650, NSW
关键词
allelopathy; competition; concentration; density; weeds;
D O I
10.1007/s12892-014-0087-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Crop allelopathy provides a viable alternative in managing resistant weed populations. A successful demonstration of an allelopathic interaction is needed to be separated from resource competition. A reliable laboratory screening technique can test this chemical interaction between a donor and a receiver species. However, the standardization of any screening tactic for a new species is really challenging. In this study we optimized the simple root exudates bioassay, Equal Compartment Agar Method (ECAM), for canola through basic features including sowing patterns, density, and distance between canola and annual ryegrass. We established that all of the above features have major roles on canola seedling interference ability (allelopathy + competition). Due to the combined effect of allelopathy and competition, the zigzag canola sowing pattern enhanced the inhibitory effects of canola seedlings more than other sowing patterns, i.e. circular, parallel, and cone. The sowing distance of canola played a major role on root growth of annual ryegrass in that the nearer the receiver annual ryegrass plants to the donor canola seedlings, the greater were the toxic effects. Canola sowing distance at 1, 2, and 3 cm inhibited the root growth of ryegrass by 50, 46, and 36%, respectively. Results also showed that root growth of ryegrass decreased with increased canola densities (0-40 seedlings/beaker). Furthermore, the added carbon experiment showed that the inhibitory effects of canola were diluted by added carbon in agar growth medium, indicating canola root exudates acted directly on the root growth of annual ryegrass. This study suggests parameters such as canola sowing pattern, density, and sowing distance between canola and test weed species need to be considered for designing canola allelopathy bioassay through ECAM under laboratory conditions. © 2014 Korean Society of Crop Science and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 272
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Asaduzzaman M., An M., Pratley J.E., Luckett D.J., Lemerle D., Canola (Brassica napus) germplasm shows variable allelopathic effects against annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum), Plant Soil, 380, pp. 47-56, (2014)
[2]  
Belliveau R., Callaway R.M., Relative effects of root comeptition and allelopathy between Cetaurea maculasa and a native bunchgrass, Oecologia, 126, pp. 444-450, (2001)
[3]  
Belz R.G., Hurle K., Dose-response - A challenge for allelopathy, Nonlinearity, 3, pp. 173-211, (2005)
[4]  
Callaway R.M., Aschehoug E.T., Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbours: A mechanism for exotic invasion, Science, 290, pp. 521-523, (2000)
[5]  
Courtois B., Olofsdotter M., Incorporating the Allelopathy Trait in Upland Rice Breeding Programs: Allelopathy in Rice, (1998)
[6]  
Fujii Y., The potential biological control of paddy weeds with allelopathy-allelopathic effect of some rice varietie, Interantional Symposium Biological Control and Intreagted Management of Paddy and Aquatic Weeds in Asia, (1992)
[7]  
Gimsing A.L., Kirkegaard J.A., Glucosinolates and isothiocyanate concentration in soil following incorporation of Brassica biofumigants, Soil Bio. Biochem., 38, pp. 2255-2264, (2006)
[8]  
Heap J., Knight R., A population of ryegrass tolerant to the herbicide diclop-methyl, J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Res., 37, pp. 149-156, (1986)
[9]  
Lemerle D., Blackshaw R.E., Smith A.B., Potter T.D., Marcroft S.J., Comparative survey of weeds surviving in triazine- tolerant and conventional canola crops in south-eastern Australia, Plant Prot. Quart., 16, pp. 37-40, (2001)
[10]  
Mahall B.E., Callaway R.M., Root communication mechanisms and intra-community distributions of two major desert shrubs, Ecology, pp. 2145-2151, (1992)