In search of a measure to address different sources of cognitive load in computer-based learning environments

被引:0
作者
Onur Dönmez
Yavuz Akbulut
Esra Telli
Miray Kaptan
İbrahim H. Özdemir
Mukaddes Erdem
机构
[1] Ege University,Department of Computer Education & Instructional Technology, Faculty of Education
[2] Anadolu University,Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education
[3] Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University,Department of Computer Education & Instructional Technology, Faculty of Education
[4] Ege University,Department of Computer Education & Instructional Technology, Graduate School of Educational Sciences
[5] Hacettepe University,Department of Computer Education & Instructional Technology, Faculty of Education
来源
Education and Information Technologies | 2022年 / 27卷
关键词
Cognitive load; Human computer interface; Scale development; Exploratory factor analysis; Confirmatory factor analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the current study, we aimed to develop a reliable and valid scale to address individual cognitive load types. Existing scale development studies involved limited number of items without adequate convergent, discriminant and criterion validity checks. Through a multistep correlational study, we proposed a three-factor scale with 13 items to address intrinsic, extraneous and germane cognitive load in computer-based learning environments. A thorough literature search of cognitive load indicators in the literature was followed by expert panels for content and construct validity. The initial item pool was administered to 236 undergraduate students who watched an instructional video on IP address classes. A multiple-choice achievement test was also implemented after the intervention. The exploratory factor analysis with maximum likelihood explained 58 percent of the variance with factor loads above .49, and internal consistency coefficients above .81. Convergent and discriminant validity indices were acceptable. Besides, achievement was related positively with the germane load and negatively with intrinsic and extraneous load. Fifteen percent of the achievement was explained by the three sources of the cognitive load. Then, the developed factor structure was validated with 193 undergraduate students immediately after they participated in online webinars, and with 99 undergraduate students after they participated in face to face classes. The proposed structure was confirmed in both settings so the scale was considered a reliable and valid indicator of cognitive load in both online and face-to-face learning environments.
引用
收藏
页码:10013 / 10034
页数:21
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Albus P(2021)Signaling in virtual reality influences learning outcome and cognitive load Computers & Education 166 104154-83
[2]  
Vogt A(2019)Cognitive load and working memory in multimedia learning: Conceptual and measurement issues Educational Psychologist 54 61-400
[3]  
Seufert T(2006)Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems Learning and Instruction 16 389-28
[4]  
Anmarkrud Ø(2020)Something old, something new from cognitive load theory Computers in Human Behavior 113 106503-61
[5]  
Andresen A(1996)Exploring the central executive The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 49 5-324
[6]  
Bråten I(2021)Seductive details do their damage also in longer learning sessions–When the details are perceived as relevant Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 6 149-114
[7]  
Ayres P(2018)Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer Frontiers in Public Health 38 53-299
[8]  
Ayres P(2003)Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning Educational Psychologist 25 315-77
[9]  
Baddeley A(2009)Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? Computers in Human Behavior 10 7-402
[10]  
Bender L(2005)Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 24 87-50