Conversations with AutoTutor Help Students Learn

被引：110

作者：

Graesser A.C. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Psychology, Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, 38152-3230, TN

来源：

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education | 2016年 / 26卷 / 01期

基金：

美国国家科学基金会;

关键词：

AutoTutor; Conversational agents; Intelligent tutoring systems; Trialogues;

D O I：

10.1007/s40593-015-0086-4

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

AutoTutor helps students learn by holding a conversation in natural language. AutoTutor is adaptive to the learners' actions, verbal contributions, and in some systems their emotions. Many of AutoTutor's conversation patterns simulate human tutoring, but other patterns implement ideal pedagogies that open the door to computer tutors eclipsing human tutors in learning gains. Indeed, current versions of AutoTutor yield learning gains on par with novice and expert human tutors. This article selectively highlights the status of AutoTutor's dialogue moves, learning gains, implementation challenges, differences between human and ideal tutors, and some of the systems that evolved from AutoTutor. Current and future AutoTutor projects are investigating three-party conversations, called trialogues, where two agents (such as a tutor and student) interact with the human learner. © 2016 International Artificial Intelligence in Education Society.

引用

页码：124 / 132

页数：8

共 45 条

[1]

Biswas G., Jeong H., Kinnebrew J., Sulcer B., Roscoe R., Measuring self-regulated learning skills through social interactions in a teachable agent environment, Research and Practice in Technology-Enhanced Learning, 5, pp. 123-152, (2010)

[2]

Cade W., Copeland J., Person N., D'Mello S.K., Dialogue modes in expert tutoring, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 470-479, (2008)

[3]

Cai Z., Graesser A.C., Forsyth C., Burkett C., Millis K., Wallace P., Halpern D., Butler H., Trialog in ARIES: User input assessment in an intelligent tutoring system, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems, pp. 429-433, (2011)

[4]

Cai Z., Graesser A.C., Hu X., ASAT: AutoTutor script authoring tool, Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Authoring Tools, (2015)

[5]

D'Mello S.K., Graesser A.C., AutoTutor and affective AutoTutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back, ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 2, pp. 1-39, (2012)

[6]

D'Mello S., Dowell N., Graesser A.C., Does it really matter whether students' contributions are spoken versus typed in an intelligent tutoring system with natural language?, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, pp. 1-17, (2011)

[7]

D'Mello S., Lehman B., Pekrun R., Graesser A.C., Confusion can be beneficial for learning, Learning and Instruction., 29, pp. 153-170, (2014)

[8]

Dillenbourg P., Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series, (1999)

[9]

Dzikovska M., Steinhauser N., Farrow E., Moore J., Campbell G., BEETLE II: Deep natural language understanding and automatic feedback generation for intelligent tutoring in basic electricity and electronics, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24, pp. 284-332, (2014)

[10]

Fiore S.M., Rosen M.A., Smith-Jentsch K.A., Salas E., Letsky M., Warner N., Toward an understanding of macrocognition in teams: Predicting processes in complex collaborative contexts, Human Factors, 52, pp. 203-224, (2010)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →