Is Moodle or WhatsApp the preferred e-learning platform at a South African university? First-year students’ experiences

被引:0
作者
Cedric Bheki Mpungose
机构
[1] University of KwaZulu-Natal,School of Education
来源
Education and Information Technologies | 2020年 / 25卷
关键词
Curriculum; Experiences; E-learning; Moodle; Physical science education; WhatsApp;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
First-year students are compelled by South African universities to use the Moodle e-learning management platform. Recent studies outline that this creates challenges during the learning process, since students struggle to use Moodle owing to their disadvantaged school background; however, they are familiar with and good at using the WhatsApp social media platform. While these studies have attempted to provide possible solutions, there is a need for an alternative option. This qualitative case study proposes alternatives and the possible use of WhatsApp to supplement Moodle, depending on the personal needs of the student. Twenty five first-year students doing Physical science education modules were purposively and conveniently sampled, and the data generated from semi-structured interviews, focus group discussion, and emailed reflective activities were thematically coded to produce a theory of e-learning platforms. Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) theory was used to direct the study and make sense of the data. The findings revealed that a personal e-learning platform which has been neglected in the past could be used to improve e-learning. It also revealed that while students only had the option of using a formal e-learning platform (Moodle), they would prefer to use their more familiar informal e-learning platform (WhatsApp). The study concludes that without considering the use of a personal e-learning platform that blends both Moodle and WhatsApp, the problem might be further escalated.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 941
页数:14
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Annamalai N(2019)Using Whatsapp to extend learning in a blended classroom environment Teaching English with Technology 19 3-20
  • [2] Ayers W(2011)The shifting ground of curriculum thought and everyday practice Thinking about schools: A foundations of education reader 2011 99-105
  • [3] Barak M(2018)Are digital natives open to change? Examining flexible thinking and resistance to change Computers & Education 121 115-123
  • [4] Berkvens J(2014)Addressing the quality challenge: Reflection on the post-2015 UNESCO EDUCATION AGENDA National Commission for UNESCO 1 1-30
  • [5] van den Akker J(2018)Online learning readiness and attitudes towards gaming in gamified online learning–a mixed methods case study International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 15 27-152
  • [6] Brugman M(2005)What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge Journal of Educational Computing Research 32 131-1054
  • [7] Bovermann K(2006)Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge Eachers College Record 108 1017-50
  • [8] Weidlich J(2016)Lecturers’ experiences of teaching STEM to students with disabilities Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D 3 37-6
  • [9] Bastiaens T(2001)Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1 On the horizon 9 1-93
  • [10] Koehler MJ(2016)Affecting higher students learning activity by using whatsapp European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences 4 88-14